Skip to content
Case File
d-26335House OversightOther

Bannon email discussing 2018 political outlook and Mueller investigation

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #026304
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The passage is a forward‑looking political commentary from Steve Bannon with no concrete allegations, transaction details, or new evidence. It mentions Donald Trump, the Mueller investigation, and Bre Bannon references pressure on Trump from the Mueller investigation. Mentions upcoming Supreme Court nomination of Brett Kavanaugh. Speculates about a possible third‑party or “chaos” candidate in 2020

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

potential-election-influencemueller-investigationpolitical-strategykavanaughpolitical-speculationtrumphouse-oversightbannon
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Vague commentary linking Trump, Bannon, and Ailes with no concrete allegations

The passage consists of informal remarks without specific actions, dates, transactions, or evidence. It offers no actionable leads, novel information, or direct ties to misconduct, making it low‑value Mentions Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, and former Fox News CEO Roger Ailes in a casual context No specific allegations, financial flows, or legal matters are described

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email discussing potential book angle with Michael Wolff and reference to Bannon and Trump

The passage contains only casual conversation about a book narrative and a meeting with Steve Bannon, without any concrete details on transactions, wrongdoing, or actionable leads. It mentions high‑pr Michael Wolff is considering framing a narrative involving Steve Bannon and Donald Trump. The sender references a meeting with Bannon scheduled for the next day. There is a vague suggestion that Repu

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Informal email chain mentioning Bannon, Trump, and media figures with a link to a Washington Times article

The passage contains casual speculation and name‑dropping (Steve Bannon, Donald Trump, Michael Douglas, Arthur Sulzberger) without any concrete details, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It re Sender suggests that Steve Bannon’s perspective may be correct and that the situation will not end u Mentions a Washington Times article about "Glenn Simpson's Fusion GPS" and a Trump smear campaign.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email chain referencing Steve Bannon interview and claim that Donald Trump promoted Obama birther theory

The passage contains a casual email discussion that repeats a well‑known claim that Trump promoted the Obama birther conspiracy and forwards a public interview link with Steve Bannon. It offers no new Email sender asks if Trump actively promoted the Obama birther theory; answer given as 'Yes'. Forwarded link to a Dutch news interview with Steve Bannon. Repeated confidentiality disclaimer suggestin

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email chain questioning Trump's promotion of Obama birther theory and forwarding a Steve Bannon interview link

The passage contains a vague rhetorical question about Trump’s stance on the Obama birther claim and a forwarded link to a Steve Bannon interview. It lacks concrete details, dates, transactions, or ac Sender asks if Donald Trump actively promoted the Obama birther theory. The email includes a link to a Dutch news interview with Steve Bannon. The correspondence is marked as confidential/attorney‑cl

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email hints at Trump‑Bannon rift and alleged White House trade‑war planning against China

The passage provides a vague reference to a personal conflict between former White House adviser Steve Bannon and President Trump and mentions a whiteboard with a calendar of trade actions. It lacks c Mentions a rift between Steve Bannon and Donald Trump. Claims Bannon kept a whiteboard listing calendar dates for trade actions against China and the EU. Suggests the president’s China policy may be

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.