Skip to content
Case File
d-26424House OversightEmail

Email discussing abstract probability concepts with no identifiable high‑profile actors

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #025180
Pages
1
Persons
1

Summary

The passage contains a casual technical discussion about probability and forces, with no mention of influential individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or wrongdoing. It offers no actionabl Conversation between two private email addresses (jeevacation@gmail.com and David Grosof). Focus on theoretical ideas about probability as a force, unrelated to any real‑world events. No references t

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

probabilitytheoretical-discussionhouse-oversightscienceemail
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Fragmented email chain mentioning a 'Davos guy' and vague meeting plans

The content consists of disjointed personal messages with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable details linking influential actors to any misconduct. The only hint of a high‑profile co Multiple short emails from the same sender (jeeitunes@gmail.com) on 06/07/19. Reference to a talk by David Pizarro on political leanings (likely irrelevant). Mention of a 'Davos guy' scheduled for Tu

1p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Informal email chain discussing probability theory, neuroscience, and speculative security advice

The passage contains casual conversation with no concrete allegations, transactions, or actionable leads involving high‑profile officials. It mentions generic topics (probability, neuroscience, open s Email exchange between Jeffrey E. and David Grosof in Jan 2017. Mentions of Watson, Crick, and a dinner with "Jin Watson" – likely a mis‑reference, no clear link to Speculative discussion of probabil

3p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Empty oversight email from Sadis & Goldberg LLP

The document contains only a mailing header and contact information with no substantive allegations, names, transactions, or actionable details linking any powerful actors to controversy. Sender address: sgalert@sglawyers.com Law firm: Sadis & Goldberg LLP, New York Recipient email: richarddavidkahn@gmail.com

1p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Email from Christina Galbraith to Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation praising financial success and joking about PR advisor Donald Trump

The passage contains a casual, largely nonsensical email with no concrete allegations, transactions, dates, or actionable details. It mentions high‑profile names (Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, David Sender claims the recipient’s name appeared in the press for financial success. Reference to a former physics professor at Dalton who became an options trader at Bear. Joking suggestion that the reci

1p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Informal email chain referencing Cohen, Pecker, civil suit and potential Mizrahi Bank hire

The passage contains vague references to Michael Cohen, David Pecker, and an unnamed civil suit, but provides no concrete details, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It is largely speculative a Mentions Michael Cohen possibly causing trouble References David Pecker without context Alludes to a civil suit involving "avenatti" (likely Avanti) and Trump

1p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Brief email request for Wall Street Journal op‑ed copy

The message contains only a routine request for a newspaper editorial and extensive boilerplate confidentiality notices. It does not mention any individuals, transactions, dates, or actions that could Sender: David Rivkin Recipient: Andrew M. Grossman Date: June 22, 2018

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.