Allegations that Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas Violate Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement
Summary
The passage outlines a potential breach of a 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by the U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO) and federal grand jury, suggesting a procedural misstep that could be pursued for Epstein entered a Non‑Prosecution Agreement on Sept. 24, 2007 with the USAO. The NPA stipulated that pending federal grand jury subpoenas would be held in abeyance unless the ag A new grand jury subp
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Debate Over Whether Jeffrey Epstein’s Federal Non‑Prosecution Deal Violated Victims’ Rights
The passage reveals that U.S. attorneys concealed a federal non‑prosecution agreement from alleged victims and possibly violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, suggesting a potential prosecutorial mis Federal non‑prosecution agreement with Epstein kept secret from victims in 2008. U.S. attorneys sent letters to victims describing an ongoing federal investigation despite the agree Assistant U.S. At
Kavanaugh‑Era DOJ Letter from Kenneth Starr Seeking Review of Federal Action Against Jeffrey Epstein
The document is a privileged attorney‑client communication from former independent counsel Kenneth Starr to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, requesting a DOJ review of a proposed federal prosecutio Starr requests Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip to review a proposed federal prosecution of Jeffre Alleges that the Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO) set an arbitrary June 2, 2008 deadline to for
Alleged Violation of 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement in Renewed Federal Grand Jury Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein
The passage outlines a claim that the Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney’s Office reinstated a grand jury subpoena despite a 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement that should have protected Epstein September 24, 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement allegedly bars further federal prosecution of Epstein a A new grand jury subpoena in New York is claimed to violate that agreement. The document cites a D
Federal prosecutors admit backing down on victim notifications in Jeffrey Epstein case after pressure from his attorneys
The passage reveals that U.S. Attorney’s Office officials altered victim‑notification procedures in 2013 due to objections from Epstein’s lawyers, suggesting possible prosecutorial misconduct and a co Federal prosecutors admitted in 2013 they altered victim‑notification obligations after pressure fro Former federal prosecutor Frances Hakes and Kenneth Staff are cited as having consulted with Epste
Letter from Kirkland & Ellis urging a de novo federal review of Jeffrey Epstein prosecution
The passage reveals internal legal strategy to challenge a federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, cites a non‑prosecution agreement, and mentions a subpoena issued by Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafan Kirkland & Ellis argues the Department's prior review was limited and not de novo. Reference to a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) that should have precluded further federal action. Assistant U.S. Att
Letter from Epstein's lawyers to Deputy Attorney General requesting DOJ review of Miami U.S. Attorney's push for federal prosecution
The passage reveals an attempt by high‑profile lawyers (Kenneth Starr, former independent counsel) to intervene in a federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, citing political connections to former Pres Lawyers Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley petitioned Deputy AG Mark Filip to review the Miami U.S. Attor The letter claims the Miami office set an arbitrary June 2 deadline to force compliance with a mod
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.