Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-26459House OversightOther

Proposed Rule 11 Amendment to Require Prosecutors to Notify and Consider Victims' Views on Plea Agreements

The passage discusses a policy proposal to amend federal Rule 11 to enhance victim participation in plea negotiations. While it cites existing DOJ guidelines and state practices, it contains no concre Proposal urges prosecutors to make reasonable efforts to notify identified victims of plea negotiati Calls for victims' views to be considered before a plea is accepted. Cites Attorney General Guidel

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017654
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage discusses a policy proposal to amend federal Rule 11 to enhance victim participation in plea negotiations. While it cites existing DOJ guidelines and state practices, it contains no concre Proposal urges prosecutors to make reasonable efforts to notify identified victims of plea negotiati Calls for victims' views to be considered before a plea is accepted. Cites Attorney General Guidel

Tags

legal-policypolicy-proposallegal-reformfederal-rule-amendmentcriminal-justice-reformhouse-oversightplea-agreementsvictims-rights

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 19 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *887 concerning ... [a] plea." !°7 But this brief mention in the rule is inferior to my specific proposal for several reasons. First, Rule 11 is the "script" when federal judges accept guilty pleas. Victims should be directly included here so that judges do not inadvertently overlook victims’ rights. Second, stating only that victims may be "reasonably heard" regarding a plea, without explaining how that will occur, invites litigation and uncertainty. For example, is a victim reasonably heard when allowed to be heard only through written submission? !°° Is a victim treated "fairly" if the court is required to address the defendant in open court but not to address the victim? If the court does not address the victim, when should the victim try to interrupt the proceedings to be heard? Should the victim's views enter into the court's calculation about whether to accept the plea? All of these questions are answered in a simple and straightforward way by my proposal - a proposal which the Advisory Committee should adopt. Rule 11(c)(1) - Prosecution To Consider Victims’ Views on Pleas The Proposals: I proposed that the prosecution should be required to consider victims' views in developing any proposed plea arrangement as follows: (1) In General. An attorney for the government and the defendant's attorney, or the defendant when proceeding pro se, may discuss and reach a plea agreement. The court must not participate in these discussions. The attorney for the government shall make reasonable efforts to notify identified victims of, and consider the victims’ views about, any proposed plea negotiations. If the defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere to either a charged offense or a lesser or related offense, [*888] the plea agreement may specify that an attorney for the government will ... [listing various options]. !°? The Advisory Committee did not recommend any change. °° Discussion: My proposed change required prosecutors to make reasonable efforts to notify victims about pleas and to consider the victims’ views regarding pleas. This requirement was taken almost verbatim from the Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance, which already directs prosecutors to "make reasonable efforts to notify identified victims of, and consider victims' views about, prospective plea negotiations." !©! According to the Department of Justice, "twenty-nine states [already] require prosecutors to "consult with’ or "obtain the views of victims at the plea agreement stage." 1° 157 Proposed Amendments, supra note 71, R. 60(a)(3), at 15-16. 158 Compare United States v. Degenhardt, 405 F. Supp. 2d 1341, 1345-46 (D. Utah 2005) (finding that a victim must be heard orally at sentencing), and United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319, 333 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (noting in dicta that § 3771(a)(4) "requires the victim to be given an opportunity actually to be “heard! rather than afforded some alternate means of communicating her views") (emphasis in original), with United States v. Marcello, 370 F. Supp. 2d 745, 749 (N.D. Ill. 2005) (holding that "in detention hearings, the victim's right to be reasonably heard does not mandate oral statements, particularly when the [victim] has no personal knowledge of the guilt of the defendant(s) and offers an opinion only on a matter that is not in dispute"). 159 Cassell, Proposed Amendments, supra note 4, at 868. 160 Proposed Amendments, supra note 71. 161 U.S. Dep't of Justice, Office for Victims of Crime, Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance 30 (2005) (defining what can be considered in determining whether notice is reasonable in a particular case) [hereinafter Dep't of Justice, Attorney General Guidelines]; see also U.S. Dep't of Justice, Office for Victims of Crime, New Directions from the Field: Victims' Rights and Services for the 21st Century 87 (1997) ("Prosecutors should make every effort ... to consult with the victim on the terms of any negotiated plea ... .") [hereinafter Dep't of Justice, New Directions from the Field]. 162 Dep't of Justice, New Directions from the Field, supra note 161, at 75 (quoting National Victims' Center, 1996 Victim's Rights Sourcebook: A Compilation of Victim's Rights Laws, Arlington, VA: National Victim Center, 1997 § 5). DAVID SCHOEN

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Law Review Article Discusses Enforcement Redundancy and Under‑enforcement in U.S. Criminal Justice

The passage is a scholarly analysis of prosecutorial discretion, under‑enforcement, and the role of federal‑state redundancy. It contains no specific allegations, transactions, dates, or names of indi Identifies ‘enforcement redundancy’ (federal‑state overlap, private prosecution, judicial review) as Notes that federal prosecutors often step in when state prosecutors decline to charge, especially

111p
House OversightUnknown

Proposed Rule 11 Amendment to Require Prosecutors to Notify and Consider Victims' Views on Plea Agreements

Proposed Rule 11 Amendment to Require Prosecutors to Notify and Consider Victims' Views on Plea Agreements The passage discusses a policy proposal to amend federal Rule 11 to enhance victim participation in plea negotiations. While it cites existing DOJ guidelines and state practices, it contains no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving high‑level officials. The information is largely procedural and already part of public discourse, offering limited investigative leads. Key insights: Proposal urges prosecutors to make reasonable efforts to notify identified victims of plea negotiations.; Calls for victims' views to be considered before a plea is accepted.; Cites Attorney General Guidelines and that 29 states already require victim consultation at the plea stage.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Law review article proposes extensive amendments to Federal Criminal Rules to implement Crime Victims' Rights Act

The document outlines policy proposals for rule changes but contains no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving specific powerful actors. It is a scholarly discussion, offering Identifies gaps in current Federal Rules where victims are barely mentioned. Cites legislative history of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and related statutes. Proposes specific rule amendments

103p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Law Review Article Proposes Expansive Victim‑Rights Amendments to Federal Criminal Rules

The document is an academic commentary urging broader implementation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It discusses legislative history, proposed rule Calls for the Advisory Committee to adopt broader victim‑fairness language in Rules 2, 11, 12, 15, 3 Highlights Senate statements (Kyl, Feinstein) emphasizing victims' rights and fairness. Notes that

156p
House OversightFeb 28, 2019

Law Review Article Proposes Expansive Victim‑Rights Amendments to Federal Criminal Rules

Law Review Article Proposes Expansive Victim‑Rights Amendments to Federal Criminal Rules The document is an academic commentary urging broader implementation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It discusses legislative history, proposed rule changes, and critiques of the Advisory Committee's limited proposals. While it references high‑level officials (Senators Jon Kyl, Dianne Feinstein, etc.) and suggests legislative action, it contains no concrete allegations of wrongdoing, financial flows, or misconduct by influential actors. The content is largely policy analysis rather than a lead for investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Calls for the Advisory Committee to adopt broader victim‑fairness language in Rules 2, 11, 12, 15, 32, 60, etc.; Highlights Senate statements (Kyl, Feinstein) emphasizing victims' rights and fairness.; Notes that the Advisory Committee’s proposals are narrower than the CVRA’s statutory language.

1p
House OversightFeb 28, 2019

LexisNexis search record for law review article on prosecutorial oversight

LexisNexis search record for law review article on prosecutorial oversight The document is merely a metadata log of a LexisNexis search for a law review article. It contains no substantive allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads linking powerful actors to misconduct. Key insights: Search conducted by user David Schoen on Feb 28, 2019; Article title: "Criminal Enforcement Redundancy: Oversight of Decisions Not to Prosecute"; Search terms: cvra and sixth amendment

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.