Proposed Rule 11 Amendment to Require Prosecutors to Notify and Consider Victims' Views on Plea Agreements
Summary
The passage discusses a policy proposal to amend federal Rule 11 to enhance victim participation in plea negotiations. While it cites existing DOJ guidelines and state practices, it contains no concre Proposal urges prosecutors to make reasonable efforts to notify identified victims of plea negotiati Calls for victims' views to be considered before a plea is accepted. Cites Attorney General Guidel
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
“...ly through written submission? !°° Is a victim treated "fairly" if the court is required to address the defendant in open court but not to address the victim? If the court does not address the victim, when should...”
The victim“...treated "fairly" if the court is required to address the defendant in open court but not to address the victim? If the court does not address the victim, when should the victim try to interrupt the proceedings...”
United States“...a agreement stage." 1° 157 Proposed Amendments, supra note 71, R. 60(a)(3), at 15-16. 158 Compare United States v. Degenhardt, 405 F. Supp. 2d 1341, 1345-46 (D. Utah 2005) (finding that a victim must be heard or...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Proposed Rule Change Requires Prosecutors to Notify Victims and Consider Their Views on Plea Agreements
The passage outlines a legal proposal to expand victims' rights in plea negotiations, citing statutes and scholarly commentary. It does not name any specific powerful individuals, agencies, or financi Rule 11(c)(1) would obligate prosecutors to make reasonable efforts to notify identified victims of Victims would be allowed to present their views directly to the court before a plea is accepted. T
Critique of Advisory Committee Proposal on Victim Address Disclosure in Federal Criminal Procedure
The passage discusses procedural proposals for victim privacy in criminal cases but does not mention any specific powerful individuals, agencies, financial transactions, or alleged misconduct. It offe Proposed rule allows courts to order victim address disclosure upon a defendant's showing of 'need'. Victim protection considerations are only triggered if the court chooses a second procedural optio
Victim Rights to Influence Federal Sentencing Guidelines Discussed in House Oversight Document
The passage outlines procedural rules allowing victims to access and comment on presentence reports and even make sentencing recommendations, which could be leveraged to examine whether victims have b Probation officers must withhold presentence reports until a guilty plea or conviction, unless conse Defendants receive the report at least 35 days before sentencing, with victims also entitled to re
Law review article proposes extensive amendments to Federal Criminal Rules to implement Crime Victims' Rights Act
The document outlines policy proposals for rule changes but contains no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving specific powerful actors. It is a scholarly discussion, offering Identifies gaps in current Federal Rules where victims are barely mentioned. Cites legislative history of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and related statutes. Proposes specific rule amendments
Law Review Article Proposes Expansive Victim‑Rights Amendments to Federal Criminal Rules
The document is an academic commentary urging broader implementation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It discusses legislative history, proposed rule Calls for the Advisory Committee to adopt broader victim‑fairness language in Rules 2, 11, 12, 15, 3 Highlights Senate statements (Kyl, Feinstein) emphasizing victims' rights and fairness. Notes that
Court rulings on nondisclosure of witness identities for safety reasons
The passage discusses legal precedent regarding witness protection and disclosure rules, but it does not mention any high‑profile individuals, financial transactions, or misconduct that would merit a U.S. v. Wills (9th Cir.) allowed delayed disclosure of a witness due to safety concerns. U.S. v. Causey (6th Cir.) and U.S. v. Elizondo (7th Cir.) similarly upheld nondisclosure when witnes The Advis
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.