Fragmented commentary on psychopathy and Jeffrey Epstein references

\TTERSON Vt have brakes at all.” stein, but she’s followed his case r type. She's especially struck by mship between powerful, wealthy women. ssive to a fourteen-year-old [girl] oman who is self-supporting and explains. : they call freshness— barely bud- exual experience. The difference is feeds their ego. re generally factors that make men >yer and whatever they want. Some ; with inflated self-images. And of us make such men think they can iey’re right.” Salter believes that certain condi- q ited by Jeffrey Epstein, might be an 3 AD” »nced, sometimes quite heavily, by >5 anymore that humans are bo ‘ ains. , amental and personality vatt nent can often, but not always, ” e. ypath, then? rella term for individual paths are often narcissistic, but ividuals wh ations inilu- 5 who dom iopathic. Some ind 228 Firtuy Ricu on young girls delude themselves into thinking that the abuse will not harm the child. They have a conscience, but they have medicated it with thinking errors. Others are flat-out psycho- pathic and simply don't care if it hurts the young girl or not. I can’t say anything about Epstein, as I have not evaluated him, but narcissism and psychopathy are concepts an evaluator would look at concerning anyone who was sexually attracted to postpu- bescent individuals but who then began to focus on younger teens. “Psychopaths are often superficially charming, high-stimulus seekers who are bored if not doing something. They lie, con, and manipulate. They do not establish deep affective ties. “They are callous and remorseless individuals who simply don’t feel bad about harming someone. “Rules don’t apply to them because they are exceptional. They are sure they won't get caught.” 229 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022036