This document is a list of exhibits attached to the Trzaskoma Declaration in a court case, including...
Summary
This document is a list of exhibits attached to the Trzaskoma Declaration in a court case, including documents related to Catherine M. Conrad's attorney registration, disciplinary history, marriage, and property records.
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The document appears to be a list of exhibits filed in a court case, including records of Catherine ...
The document appears to be a list of exhibits filed in a court case, including records of Catherine Conrad/Rosa and Frank Rosa's criminal history, as well as documents related to a previous court case, Conrad v. Manessis.
The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request...
The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request to close the courtroom during her testimony due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding.
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about...
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about a Westlaw report concerning a juror, Catherine M. Conrad. The witness confirms that the report matches the juror's information provided to the firm before voir dire.
The transcript documents Catherine Conrad's testimony in the case United States v. Daugerdas, where ...
The transcript documents Catherine Conrad's testimony in the case United States v. Daugerdas, where she is questioned about her previous statements and actions as a juror, and initially invokes her Fifth Amendment privilege before being granted use immunity.
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Edelstein being questioned about statements made in a court brie...
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Edelstein being questioned about statements made in a court brief, specifically regarding the defendants' knowledge and investigation into Catherine Conrad. Edelstein confirms the accuracy of certain statements while also revealing her awareness of Theresa Trzaskoma's discovery of the Appellate Division suspension report.
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential ...
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, and whether she had her team conduct additional research before voir dire. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team to do so, relying instead on the voir dire process to determine if Catherine M. Conrad was the same person mentioned in a New York court opinion.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.