Philosophical essay on social brain and science, no actionable leads
Summary
The passage is a generic discussion of neuroscience, philosophy, and social theory with no mention of specific individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers no concrete i Discusses the shift from theology to science in academia Explores the concept of the social brain and its evolutionary basis Mentions historical figures only in a scholarly context (Daniel Boorstin)
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Philosophical essay on morality, age limits, and brain function
The document contains no concrete allegations, names, transactions, or actionable intelligence linking powerful actors to misconduct. It is a speculative discussion of ethics and neuroscience without Discusses brain mechanisms of lying and denial Questions age-based legal thresholds in the U.S. References historian Daniel Goldhagen and the Holocaust metaphorically
Philosophical essay on evolution, intelligence, and AI with no actionable claims
The text contains only general philosophical commentary about evolution and AI, with no mention of specific individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers no investigative Discusses evolution of human intelligence versus other life forms References Daniel Dennett and Descartes Speculates on AI's future impact without concrete claims
Philosophical discussion on AGI behavior and legal analogies
The text is a speculative essay on AI alignment and legal theory without any concrete names, transactions, dates, or actionable leads involving real actors or institutions. Compares AI goal optimization to chess strategies. Speculates on AGI punishment and legal liability. References Daniel Dennett's essay on AGI invulnerability.
Philosophical essay by Daniel Dennett with no actionable investigative content
The document consists of literary commentary on philosophy, AI, and historical thinkers. It contains no names of current officials, financial transactions, or allegations of misconduct, offering no in Mentions Daniel C. Dennett, Norbert Wiener, Alan Turing – historical figures, not current actors. Discusses AI concepts and philosophical ideas without linking to any specific policy or wrongdoing.
Essay on Hybrid Organizational Superintelligence by W. Daniel Hillis
The passage is a speculative essay about the nature of organizations as hybrid intelligences. It contains no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable allegations involving powerful actors. W Describes organizations as 'hybrid superintelligences' combining humans and technology. References Norbert Wiener’s early warnings about emergent machine intelligence. Claims that corporations, gover
Philosophical essay on determinism and free will, no actionable investigative content
The passage consists of abstract philosophical musings without any mention of individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or alleged misconduct. It provides no leads for investigation. Discusses determinism vs. free will References Daniel Dennett and Richard Feynman No names of political or corporate actors
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.