Gerald Ford recounts dinner conversation about Justice Stevens and Nixon pardon
Summary
The passage is a personal recollection with no new factual claims, financial details, or actionable leads. It merely repeats known historical information about Ford's view of his own pardon of Nixon a Ford described his pardon of Nixon as the decision that cost him reelection. Ford praised Justice John Paul Stevens as a great, non‑ideological justice.
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (5)
The document appears to be a transcript of a legal discussion or argument, focusing on whether the a...
The document appears to be a transcript of a legal discussion or argument, focusing on whether the actions of the Brune law firm on May 12, 2011, constituted a 'strategic judgment'. The speaker analyzes the concept of strategic judgment, referencing the Second Circuit and Justice Stevens' dissent, to determine if the firm's actions were a deliberate choice or oversight.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
The document appears to be a transcript of a legal discussion or argument, focusing on whether the actions of the Brune law firm on May 12, 2011, constituted a 'strategic judgment'. The speaker analyzes the concept of strategic judgment, referencing the Second Circuit and Justice Stevens' dissent, to determine if the firm's actions were a deliberate choice or oversight.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 16166320 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
The document appears to be a transcript of a court hearing or argument where an attorney is discussing the strategic decisions made during juror selection, specifically regarding a juror with a 'checkered history'. The attorney argues that their decision was not a 'sandbagging' tactic, but rather a genuine change of heart after re-evaluating the juror's note.
transcript of a legal discussion or deposition: A-5905
The document discusses whether the Brune firm's actions on May 12, 2011, constituted a 'strategic judgment', and explores the definition of this term through references to Justice Stevens' dissent and Second Circuit guidance.
transcript: A-5906
The transcript discusses a case where an attorney, Theresa, had second thoughts about a juror and investigated further, ultimately deciding to keep the juror. The discussion highlights the government's view that the decision was strategic and aimed at securing an acquittal.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.