Skip to content
Case File
d-27561House OversightOther

Email exchange between Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and a private individual discussing religion and secular dogma

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #028933
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The passage contains a routine academic discussion with no concrete allegations, financial details, or links to powerful officials or agencies. It offers no actionable leads for investigation. Participants: Lawrence Krauss (ASU professor), Noam Chomsky (public intellectual), and a private ema Topic: Debate over the role of religion and secular nationalism in society. No mention of any government b

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

academic-correspondencesecularismreligionhouse-oversightpublic-discourse
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email chain discussing religion, fanaticism, and academic opinions

The passage contains a casual email exchange among academics with no concrete allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful officials. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Emails involve Lawrence Krauss, a physicist, and Noam Chomsky, a linguist. Discussion centers on religious and secular fanaticism, not specific misconduct. No mention of financial transactions, government ag

1p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Casual email chain among academics discussing religion and article links

The document contains a personal email exchange between Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and an unnamed individual. It discusses opinions on fanaticism and shares a New Yorker article link. There are no Email participants are public intellectuals, not government officials. No mention of financial transactions, legal matters, or policy decisions. Contains standard confidentiality disclaimer typical o

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email chain discussing religion, fanaticism, and academic opinions – no substantive lead

The passage consists of informal email exchanges between private individuals (including Lawrence Krauss and Noam Chomsky) about philosophical views on religion and secular dogma. It contains no concre Informal discussion of religion and fanaticism. Mentions of public intellectuals (Krauss, Chomsky) but no claims of wrongdoing. No references to government bodies, financial flows, or illegal activit

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Forwarded email exchange between Lawrence Krauss and Noam Chomsky about a contentious article

The passage contains a routine academic correspondence with no concrete allegations, transactions, or actionable leads. It mentions only two public intellectuals, neither of whom hold governmental pow Email chain dated September 10, 2015 between Lawrence Krauss and Noam Chomsky. Discussion centers on an unnamed article and the concept of ridicule in debate. No substantive claims, dates, or entitie

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email exchange between Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and a private individual discussing secular vs religious dogma

The document contains a casual academic discussion with no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or links to powerful officials or agencies. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confir Krauss and Chomsky exchange views on religion, secular dogma, and academic discourse. Reference to a New Yorker article about militant atheism. No substantive claims about misconduct, financial flows

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email chain between Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky and a private individual discussing religion and secular dogma

The document contains only personal opinions and a link to a New Yorker article; it does not mention any concrete actions, financial transactions, or misconduct involving high‑level officials or agenc Conversation between academic figures (Krauss, Chomsky) and a private email address. Reference to a New Yorker article about scientists and militant atheism. Standard confidentiality disclaimer attac

2p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.