Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-27808House OversightOther

Attorney Dershowitz and Boies Discuss Alleged Sexual Encounter with Ms. Roberts in 2015 Meeting

The passage provides a detailed account of internal strategy discussions between high‑profile lawyers Alan Dershowitz and David Boies regarding a sexual‑assault allegation. While it offers specific na July 6, 2015 meeting where Dershowitz tried to convince Boies the accuser was mistaken. Boies reportedly remained convinced the accuser’s recollection was honest. Reference to a lie‑detector test all

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #018033
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides a detailed account of internal strategy discussions between high‑profile lawyers Alan Dershowitz and David Boies regarding a sexual‑assault allegation. While it offers specific na July 6, 2015 meeting where Dershowitz tried to convince Boies the accuser was mistaken. Boies reportedly remained convinced the accuser’s recollection was honest. Reference to a lie‑detector test all

Tags

court-documentssexual-assault-allegationhighprofile-attorneyslegal-strategydefamationlegal-exposurehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
10, Il. Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-13 Filed 04/16/19 Page 4 of 4 the July 6, 2015 meeting, Mr. Dershowitz expressed to me that he believed he was making progress in convincing Mr. Boies that the client was mistaken in identifying Mr. Dershowitz as someone with whom she had sex. I told Mr. Dershowitz that I thought he was overly optimistic and reading things into what Mr. Boies was saying and hearing what he wanted to hear. I truly believe this was the case, i.e., that Mr. Boies was making careful and guarded statements consistent with statements lawyers often make in settlement discussions and that Mr. Dershowitz, who urgently wanted the case to go away, was reading things into those statements that weren’t there. My recollection is that, at all times, Mr. Boies remained adamant that the client’s assertions about Mr. Dershowitz represented her best, honest recollection. For example, at one point, Mr. Dershowitz told Mr. Boies that Ms. Roberts could well believe that she had sex with Mr. Dershowitz because she might be confusing Mr. Dershowitz with Nathan Myhrvold who spent a lot of time with Mr. Epstein and who looked a lot like Mr. Dershowitz. Mr. Dershowitz urged Mr. Boies to convince his client that she was mistaken and that she had actually had sex with Mr. Myhrvold. Mr. Boies told Mr. Dershowitz that he obviously did not have personal knowledge as to what had or had not happened, but that he had taken steps to verify that Ms. Roberts was telling the truth as she believed it. Shortly thereafter, 1 came to understand that Ms. Roberts had taken, and passed, a lie detector test. At no time in my presence, whether in the presence of Mr. Dershowitz or outside of it, did Mr. Boies ever say that he believed or was convinced that Ms. Roberts was mistaken or that Mr. Dershowitz did not have sex with Ms. Roberts. Ms. McCawley said very little at the meetings. Furthermore, I do not recall Ms. McCawley ever expressing any doubt that Mr. Dershowitz had sex with Ms. Roberts and I am confident that I would recall such a statement if it was made, given the circumstances. In addition, Mr. Dershowitz never suggested to me that Ms. McCawley doubted that Ms. Robert’s allegations were false. ones _ avid S. Stone KAITLIN MAY LUZZI ID # 2448450 NOTARY PUBLIC evATE QF NEW JERSEY My Commission Expires July 31, 2019

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:19-CV-03377
Phone2448450

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Attorney Dershowitz and Boies Discuss Alleged Sexual Encounter with Ms. Roberts in 2015 Meeting

Attorney Dershowitz and Boies Discuss Alleged Sexual Encounter with Ms. Roberts in 2015 Meeting The passage provides a detailed account of internal strategy discussions between high‑profile lawyers Alan Dershowitz and David Boies regarding a sexual‑assault allegation. While it offers specific names and a timeline, it lacks concrete evidence of wrongdoing or financial transactions, limiting its immediate investigative utility. Nonetheless, the involvement of two nationally known attorneys makes it a moderate‑value lead for further fact‑checking and potential civil or criminal inquiries. Key insights: July 6, 2015 meeting where Dershowitz tried to convince Boies the accuser was mistaken.; Boies reportedly remained convinced the accuser’s recollection was honest.; Reference to a lie‑detector test allegedly passed by the accuser.

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz Seeks to Seal Deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] While Alleging Prior Immunity Deal with Epstein and False Clinton Presence Claims

The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz is attempting to keep a deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] confidential, while simultaneously asserting that former President Clinton was not on Epstein’s island an Dershowitz requests the court modify a confidentiality order to use Giuffre’s deposition in his defe The motion cites a former FBI Director’s FOIA finding that President Clinton was not on Little St.

39p
House OversightNov 23, 2015

Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case

Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case The passage reveals a motion to keep certain filings confidential that contain allegations of sexual abuse by a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, on behalf of [REDACTED - Survivor]. While it identifies a potential lead—unsealing these records could provide evidence of misconduct—it lacks concrete details such as dates of alleged abuse, financial transactions, or direct links to powerful political figures. The controversy is moderate, and the novelty is limited given the public nature of the Dershowitz‑Giuffre allegations. Key insights: Defendants Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell filed a response to Dershowitz’s motion to keep records confidential.; The contested records are three filings that recount [REDACTED - Survivor]’s allegations of sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz.; Plaintiffs argue the filings are not confidential and should be part of the public record in the defamation case.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court

Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court The filing reveals a procedural move by a high‑profile attorney to access testimony from [REDACTED - Survivor], a key witness in the Epstein‑related allegations. While it connects a well‑known lawyer to the case, it offers no new factual disclosures, financial flows, or direct involvement of senior officials. The lead is moderately useful for tracking litigation strategy but lacks novel or explosive content. Key insights: Dershowitz filed a motion to lift a confidentiality seal on a deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor].; The motion was filed on Feb 3 2016, referencing a Jan 12 2016 confidentiality order.; Dershowitz argues the need to share the testimony with expert witnesses and other parties for his defense.

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition transcript metadata for Jeffrey Epstein-related civil case (Oct 2015)

The document is a standard deposition record showing counsel appearances, contact information, and exhibit references. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or new connections to Deposition taken on Oct 17, 2015, telephonically on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Counsel listed includes Darren K. Indyke, Bradley J. Edwards, Paul G. Cassell, and others. Exhibit numbers (e.g., 4, 5,

1p
House OversightApr 17, 2019

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specific actions (e.g., alleged drafting of the NPA, defamatory statements, settlement confidentiality) and dates that could be pursued for documentary evidence, witness interviews, and financial‑flow analysis. If substantiated, the lead would expose potential prosecutorial misconduct and high‑level collusion, generating major public outrage. Key insights: Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz.; Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded Epstein and co‑conspirators.; Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, approved the NPA; later became Trump’s Secretary of Labor.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.