Defense team seeks protective sidebar to shield Boies Schiller lawyers from alleged aggressive language in trial
Summary
The passage is a routine procedural request in a court case, mentioning only the defense firm and its attorneys. It lacks concrete allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑level official Defense counsel requests a sidebar or in‑camera hearing to prevent certain statements from reaching Mentions alleged aggressive language by the defense team toward the plaintiff’s team. Specifically
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Court hearing references alleged accusations involving world leaders and Alan Dershowitz in a sexual‑abuse case
The passage hints at a claim that a plaintiff’s statement links high‑profile figures (unspecified world leaders and Alan Dershowitz) to alleged wrongdoing, suggesting a possible foreign‑influence or e Plaintiff’s statement reportedly mentions "world leaders" and Alan Dershowitz as part of alleged lie Defense counsel argues the plaintiff would lose if she cannot prove Maxwell’s role. The court appe
Court hearing on limiting derogatory language in Giuffre defamation case
The passage merely records a procedural objection to calling a plaintiff a prostitute or slut in a defamation trial. It contains no concrete leads, transactions, or new allegations involving powerful Defense counsel objected to any derogatory language toward the plaintiff. The court is considering a motion to exclude terms like "prostitute" or "slut". The case involves defamation claims related t
Internal memo reveals aggressive defense strategy for Jeffrey Epstein involving high‑profile attorneys and attempts to disqualify prosecutors
The passage details a coordinated defense effort for Epstein that included Alan Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr, and other senior legal figures, and describes attempts to disqualify prosecutors. It suggests Defense team hired Alan Dershowitz, former Dean Kenneth Starr, and other senior lawyers for Epstein. Defense counsel attempted to disqualify at least two prosecutors by investigating their personal l
Court hearing references alleged trafficking of witness to foreign presidents and world leaders
The excerpt mentions vague claims that a witness was trafficked to foreign presidents and world leaders, but provides no names, dates, transactions, or concrete evidence. It suggests a possible lead a Witness alleges being trafficked to foreign presidents and world leaders. Defense counsel seeks to exclude those statements from evidence. No specific foreign leaders, dates, or financial details are
Victim Privacy Concerns in Federal Subpoena Procedures Highlighted by 2007 Case and Advisory Committee Proposal
The passage discusses procedural flaws in how victim-sensitive records can be subpoenaed without notice, citing a specific 2007 federal case and an email from then‑U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein. While Defense counsel used Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c) to obtain a victim's VA medical records ex parte and und Victim and prosecutor were unaware of the subpoena until counsel warned of potential harm. Current
Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Jeffrey Epstein Case Involving Federal Prosecutors and FAUSA Jeffrey Sloman
The passage alleges irregular conduct by the Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office, including inappropriate involvement of a First Assistant U.S. Attorney (Jeffrey Sloman) in both the Epstein case and a separa FAUSA Jeffrey Sloman allegedly participated in the initial phone call with Epstein's defense counsel AUSA Marie Villafana issued document requests for Epstein's 2004‑2005 tax returns and medical reco
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.