Confidential Deposition Notice in Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell (SDNY, 2016)
Summary
The passage is merely a procedural filing confirming a deposition took place. It contains no substantive allegations, names beyond the parties, dates, or financial/foreign links that could be pursued. Case filed in Southern District of New York, No. 15‑CV‑07433‑RWS Deposition of plaintiff Virginia L. Giuffre taken on May 18, 2016 Location: Boies Schiller & Flexner office in Fort Lauderdale, FL
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Deposition Header in Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell Case (June 20, 2016)
The excerpt only provides basic filing information—court, case number, parties, date, location, and reporter details—without any substantive allegations, names of powerful actors, financial transactio Case filed in Southern District of New York, case number 15-CV-07433-RWS Plaintiff: Virginia L. Giuffre; Defendant: Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition taken on June 20, 2016 in Miami, Florida
Complaint filing in Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell (SDNY, 1:15‑cv‑07433)
The document is merely a docket header with no substantive allegations, names beyond the parties, dates, or details that could guide an investigation. It provides no new leads, financial flows, or con Case filed in Southern District of New York on 09/21/2015 Plaintiff: Virginia L. Giuffre Defendant: Ghislaine Maxwell
Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Omnibus Motion in Limine – Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell (SDNY)
The excerpt is merely a filing header with attorney contact information and case identification. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the Case number 1:15‑cv‑07433‑RWS in the Southern District of New York Plaintiff: Virginia L. Giuffre Defendant: Ghislaine Maxwell
Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017)
The document is a routine court docket listing parties, counsel, and judge for an oral argument. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the Case number: 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) Judge: Hon. Robert W. Sweet Plaintiff: Virginia L. Giuffre
Testimony links press coverage of the Dershowitz litigation to alleged reputational damage of Virginia Giuffre in Maxwell case
The excerpt suggests a possible strategy by plaintiffs to use negative press from the Dershowitz‑Giuffre litigation to claim damages against Ghislaine Maxwell. While it mentions high‑profile individua Plaintiff argues that press coverage of the Dershowitz‑Giuffre case damaged Giuffre's reputation. Defense contends the press articles do not mention Maxwell and therefore cannot support a damages cl
Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Omnibus Motion in Limine – Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell (SDNY)
The document is merely a filing header with attorney contact information and case caption. It contains no substantive allegations, names beyond the parties, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. C Case involves Virginia L. Giuffre suing Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. Filing is a response to an omnibus motion in limine. Counsel listed: Laura A. Menninger, Jeffrey S. Pag
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.