Transcript excerpt shows obscure witness questioning about reporters and alleged drug arrest
Summary
The passage provides vague, fragmented testimony with no concrete names, dates, financial amounts, or clear links to high‑level officials. It mentions a witness, their mother and her husband Paul, but Witness repeatedly denied any contact with reporters or receipt of money. Reference to an alleged drug arrest and cooperation, but no details. Names mentioned: Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, Paul (husband of
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Courtroom exchange featuring Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein with vague references to surveillance and name‑tag switching
The excerpt contains a disjointed transcript with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It hints at someone being searched for and a possible surveillance incident, but provid Witness mentions being aware that 'people were looking for me' without identifying who they were. Reference to a night when the witness and a friend 'switched name tags' – unclear relevance. Repeated
Heated exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold during House Oversight hearing
The passage records a confrontational dialogue with no concrete allegations, dates, financial details, or links to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond noting a possible Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of lying in a letter to co‑counsel. Both parties exchange threats of sanctions and accusations of obstruction. The exchange occurs during a House Oversight session (docum
Deposition excerpt showing attorney objections to questions about witness Saige's alleged false statements
The passage provides a narrow view of a courtroom exchange with no named high‑profile officials, financial details, or foreign actors. It suggests a possible dispute over a witness’s testimony but lac Attorney Mr. Tein questions witness Saige about alleged lies to avoid deposition and subpoena. Attorney Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the form of the questions, citing lack of foundation. The wit
Courtroom exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold over parental police report
The passage provides a brief, disjointed transcript with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations linking influential actors. It lacks actionable details and appears to be ro Mr. Tein questions Mr. Leopold about the parents who filed a police report. The dialogue suggests a dispute over the relevance and appropriateness of the question. No specific individuals, agencies,
House Oversight hearing transcript shows heated exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold over witness questioning
The passage records a procedural dispute in a congressional hearing with no specific names of high‑ranking officials, no financial or foreign influence details, and no actionable leads. It offers mini Mr. Leopold objects to a line of questioning as improper. Mr. Tein challenges Leopold's demeanor and asks him to stop. The exchange highlights tension but provides no concrete allegations or evidence
Fragmented House Oversight Transcript with No Substantive Claims
The passage consists of disjointed dialogue from a hearing with no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details. It offers no actionable leads or novel information about influential actors Contains brief mentions of Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Goldberger. References attorney-client privilege objections. No specific misconduct, transactions, or policy issues identified.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.