Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-28161House OversightFinancial Record

Epstein’s alleged compliance with non‑prosecution agreement and continued scientific patronage

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #022038
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage repeats known claims that Jeffrey Epstein fulfilled a non‑prosecution agreement and mentions his science‑focused website and sponsored conferences. It offers no new concrete evidence, date Claims Epstein met all terms of his federal non‑prosecution agreement. States there are no pending civil lawsuits or investigations. Describes Epstein’s launch of a science‑themed website and sponsor

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinfinancial-flowforeign-influencenonprosecution-agreementlegal-exposurehouse-oversightlegal-statusscience-sponsorship
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Firtuy Ricu Goldberger said. “There are no pending civil lawsuits. There are not and should not be any pending investigations, given Mr. Epstein’s complete fulfillment of all the terms of his non-prosecution agreement with the federal government.” If there was an investigation, nothing had come of it yet. For the moment, Epstein was free—free to turn his attention, again, to intellectual pursuits. He launched a website, JeffreyEpstein- CHAPTER ce ” q Science.com, that featured blog posts such as “Conversations ® with Jeffrey Epstein,” “The Value of Quantum Computation to Jeffrey Epstein,” “Why Evolutionary Biology Intrigues Jeffrey Epstein,” and “An Understanding of Theoretical Physics from Jeffrey Epstein.” The latter post began: “This is where Jeffrey Epstein takes you to the very cutting edge of the frontiers of knowledge to explore and discuss our basic understanding of the subtle, simple, and hidden [qualities] that lie beneath... our th jail, but he wasn’t done settling i 4 S universe.” ms. Under the conditions of his ~ it, he’s even paid for the victims 3 vemed to ensure that he would not mes. Double jeopardy was worl ily of 2010, reports began to —_ | toact li . doe tors were following other leads" , these academic scientists— without people like him they wouldn't _ have any money.” child-trafficking charges and ; | “jeffrey doesn’t know shit about science,” says Stuart Pivar, the __ art collector who has known Epstein for more than three decades. ' “Does he like to act like he does? Yes. But he doesn’t. But as far as Other friends of Epstein’s say that he truly did have a bril- al’s office refused to comment. It ‘liant mind for science. And in any case, Epstein had done more 2r O- 1 or deny the existence of an ongo east than sponsor individual scientists. He'd also sponsored confer- ences on Little Saint Jeff’s. On his website, he announced a con- fe ence called Mindshift at which Nobel laureates, such as the he Oretical physicist Murray Gell-Mann, would mix with sur- stein’s lawyers told the Daily B of such an investigation. “Je with all state and federal requit Palm Beach, | seons, engineers, and futurists and where professors would or proceedings in 231 230

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and Leslie Wexner entangled in alleged $1 Billion extortion scheme linked to Jeffrey Epstein’s network

The document contains multiple specific allegations that connect high‑profile figures – Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and billionaire Leslie Wexner – to a coordinated extortion effort involving a $5 Virginia Roberts’ lawyers allegedly pressured her to name Prince Andrew and Dershowitz to leverage a Rebecca (Roberts’ friend) allegedly demanded £500,000 from the Prince for access, and claimed the

68p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Epstein Claims No Pending Lawsuits or Investigations After Non‑Prosecution Agreement

The passage repeats known information about Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement and his post‑agreement activities (a personal website and alleged scientific sponsorships). It provides no new n Goldberger states there are no pending civil lawsuits or investigations concerning Epstein. Epstein launched a personal website (JeffreyEpstein-Science.com) featuring blog posts on scientific Claims

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

09/11/2007

09/11/2007 Pursuant to a federal investigation regarding the sexual exploitation of minors, Eileen Guggenheim was interviewed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation(FBI). Present during the interview was Guggenheim's husband, Russell Wilkinson, and Assistant United States Attorney . After being advised of the identity of the interviewing agents an purpose of the interview, Guggenheim voluntarily provided the following information: Guggenheim, current Chairman of the New York Academy of Arts(NYAA) board, met Jeffrey Epstein through NYAA functions. In the 1990's, the time period she met Epstein, Guggenheim was lecturing and working with student services at the NYAA. Epstein was a former NYAA board member. Guggenheim stated her husband, Russell Wilkinson, could provide additional information regarding Epstein and his association to the NYAA at which time Wilkinson engaged in conversation with the interviewing agents. Wilkinson advised that Epstein was a NYAA board member

2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01969798

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.