Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-28165House OversightOther

Personal email exchange vaguely referencing a former president with no actionable details

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #026369
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains only vague, unsubstantiated personal opinions about a former president and repetitive confidentiality notices. It provides no names, dates, transactions, or concrete allegations t Sender mentions a former president (Clinton) making contradictory statements. No specific wrongdoing, financial flow, or illegal activity is described. Repeated boilerplate confidentiality disclaimer

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

former-presidentpersonal-correspondenceunverified-claimhouse-oversight
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Sent: 1/23/2016 3:28:09 PM To: Kathy Ruemmler Subject: Re: Importance: High My memory is a friend killer - I stopped talking to clinton when he swore, with whole hearted conviction to me , that he had done something„ he had forgotten that he also swore the exact opposite to me only weeks before. . On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Kathy Ruemmler <=1111> wrote: He obviously said something to you yesterday that was disturbing, and you don't want to tell me. Just tell me - - I can take it. I promise. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 23, 2016, at 9:22 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: I was wrong On Saturday, January 23, 2016, Kathy Ruemmler > wrote: I will just say I told you so. Not to sound overly dramatic, but he is very close to being a psychopath -- he has no conscience. It's scary. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 23, 2016, at 8:40 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: i could never ever verify its authenticity. so- yes . On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Kathy Ruemmler < wrote: Meaning I win the bet that I will never receive an apology and acknowledgment of acceptance of responsibility? On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:58 AM jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: You were right and I was wrong. Humble pie, crow, or my own words is what i get to eat today. your choice On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Kathy Ruemmler <____________________ What part do you find disturbing? Do you think he is losing it? Sent from my iPhone On Jan 22, 2016, at 6:21 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: talking to macgiver, disturbs me, and that takes a lot please note > wrote: The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02494747

2p
House OversightUnknown

Private email hints at Obama favoring former White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler for Attorney General

Private email hints at Obama favoring former White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler for Attorney General The passage merely forwards a Bloomberg article and includes a brief, informal exchange confirming the story. It provides no new facts, dates, transactions, or actionable leads beyond a publicly reported speculation, so its investigative usefulness is low. However, it does reference a high‑profile nomination process, giving it modest controversy and power linkage. Key insights: Email chain between a person using the name "jeffrey E." and someone identified as Kathy Ruemmler.; Mentions a Bloomberg article linking Kathryn Ruemmler as Obama’s favorite for Attorney General.; Timestamped October 14‑15, 2014, indicating contemporaneous awareness of the speculation.

1p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Personal email exchange between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. with trivial remarks

The content consists of casual, non‑business conversation with no mention of financial transactions, wrongdoing, or high‑level officials. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Exchange appears to be personal, arranging a meeting in New York. Contains a vague, unrelated comment about Donald Trump. Repeated legal disclaimer about confidentiality and privilege.

2p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02484900

4p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02591751

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Former White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler declines Obama’s offer to be Attorney General

The passage provides a routine political development with no new allegations, financial flows, or misconduct. It mentions high‑profile officials but offers no actionable leads beyond the fact that Rue Ruemmler told President Obama she does not want to be nominated for Attorney General. She cited concerns about a difficult confirmation process and potential political attacks on Obama. The email lis

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.