1 duplicate copy in the archive
kaggle-ho-021525
Girl drops lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein amid parental dispute
The passage reveals a pending civil suit involving Jeffrey Epstein and a minor, the involvement of a former federal prosecutor (Guy Lewis) now defending Epstein, and mentions prior criminal indictment Epstein was sued by a minor (Jane Doe) for alleged sexual activity when she was 14. The lawsuit was dropped because the girl's parents could not agree on litigation strategy. The girl's father previo
Summary
The passage reveals a pending civil suit involving Jeffrey Epstein and a minor, the involvement of a former federal prosecutor (Guy Lewis) now defending Epstein, and mentions prior criminal indictment Epstein was sued by a minor (Jane Doe) for alleged sexual activity when she was 14. The lawsuit was dropped because the girl's parents could not agree on litigation strategy. The girl's father previo
Persons Referenced (3)
“...dicted in July 2006 on a single count of felony solicitation of prostitution. The case is pending. Jane Does parents separated. two months after she was born at Good Sa- maritan Medical Center, according to c...”
Guy Lewis“...s i in federal prison, plus three years’ probation. The US. attorney overseeing his prosecution was Guy Lewis. Now in private practice, Lewis was hired by Epstein to defend ' him against the father’s lawsuit...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...each Post Staff Writer ‘A girl who says that wealthy money manager and parttime Palm Beach resident Jeffrey Epstein engaged in *. sexual activity with her when she was 14, has dropped her lawsuit against him becau...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
[email protected]Related Documents (6)
EFTA01682733
NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct
The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C
EFTA Document EFTA01334281
Rival Mast* Case Report CialeOtanal 2002-10 12836/1901 AsssIsse I-atm *nine Gee utast> Feolearlber 300-13 Printed By: WATSON Da'f I Renewals° Cafe Tee Prostitution-Epstein Acta* Casa Dapassiem Seurfir I Active UNFOUNDED Zola Des Er an B Casa I. Updated L. Updaled Ely 081°6120°4 1 ' lit. Import 08/06/2004 Import Narrative/Notes Pan, Beach Poeta OCVAN Unit 345 5 County Rd. Palm Buck FL Prune 51514138-5474 Fax 1455-9653 (ff." Not on Fee I Ciro Printed: Frida
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 57
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 57 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rule 56.1, move for summary judgment on the issue of the United States Government's violation of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), where no genuine issue of material fact exists.' In support, they state: INTRODUCTION In 2004, Congress enacted the CVRA because it found that in case after case "victims, and their families, were ignored, cast aside, and treated as non-participants in a critical event in their lives. They were
Rival Mast*
DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01334281
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 1 of 24
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.