Witness McCawley questioned about prior knowledge of reports related to Epstein investigations (2006‑2009)

10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3vlgiu2 activity, that's the truth. MS. McCAWLEY: Yes, could be aware of the report her testimony is that she wo "90s until 2009. This inves Honor, during the course of the Palm Beach home and his person. So yes, of course, questions, show her the repo these reports? Were you awa you know, as part of this in answer that. THE COURT: Well, t You could show her the repor but that would not get the h MS. McCAWLEY: Well two other of the exceptions, which we talked about, and w residual hearsay -- ERE bu COURT: Yes, 132 But aware of the reports. your Honor, and the reason why she she'll s is becaus remember, rked for Epstein from the early tigation took place in 2006, your the time she was allegedly managing active employee, his right-hand we should be able to ask her those rt: Were you aware of this, of re that these reports were made, vestigation? And then she can hat's fine. You could do that. ts and say, were you aware of them, earsay part in. and of course we have , your Honor, the business record xception, e also noticed this as one of the t even as a business record, I under the business records think counsel is correct exception, the activities of becaus the cops and what they did, all of but that can go in, yes, not the statements. MS. McCAWLEY: So £ SOUTHERN DIST (2-2 they're under a duty, etc., or example, one of the witnesses on RICT REPORTERS, P.C. ) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011435