Skip to content
Case File
d-286House OversightLegal Filing

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-286
Pages
1
Persons
4

Summary

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's access to discovery materials. The government defers to the MDC on the issue of laptop access on weekends and holidays, but notes that Maxwell has had extensive access to discovery materials. The government has provided a laptop for Maxwell's exclusive use and has made efforts to address technical issues with reviewing discovery materials.

Tags

Ghislaine Maxwell's access to discovery materialsUse of laptop for reviewing discovery on weekends and holidaysManagement of discovery materials at the Metropolitan Detention Center
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed ...

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed redactions to certain reply briefs and exhibits in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests that certain information be redacted or sealed to protect the privacy interests of third parties and victims. The defense has indicated its position on the proposed redactions, and the government respectfully requests that the Court adopt the proposed redactions.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redaction...

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redactions to reply briefs and exhibits in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests redactions to certain documents to protect third-party privacy interests, which the court ultimately grants. The court also orders the parties to propose redactions or file Exhibit L of Reply Brief 6 on the public docket.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The US Attorney's office informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that neither the government nor the defense ...

The US Attorney's office informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that neither the government nor the defense seeks redactions to Exhibit L of Reply Brief 3, and it will be filed publicly. The letter is in response to the court's order regarding potential redactions. The case involves Ghislaine Maxwell.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The US Attorney's Office submitted a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan updating the court on Ghislain...

The US Attorney's Office submitted a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan updating the court on Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center. The letter details Maxwell's access to discovery materials, communication with her attorneys, and the search procedures in place at the MDC. The Government reports that Maxwell is receiving extensive accommodations, including 13 hours a day, 7 days a week to review discovery, and 25 hours a week of video-teleconference calls with her counsel.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the redac...

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the redaction of certain court documents in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The government proposes redactions to protect victim and third-party privacy, which the court ultimately orders. The court unseals the August 13 Opinion and orders the defendant to file redacted versions of certain documents.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the parti...

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the parties' motions in limine and proposed redactions in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. Both the government and defense have filed motions with redactions, citing the need to protect victim and witness privacy, as well as third-party privacy interests. The defense has objected to the government's broader proposed redactions and sealing requests.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.