Skip to content
Case File
d-289House OversightLegal Filing

The document details the search procedures and communication protocols in place for the defendant at...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-289
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The document details the search procedures and communication protocols in place for the defendant at MDC, including pat-down searches, cell searches, and body scans. It also highlights the measures taken to facilitate communication between the defendant and their counsel. The filing is submitted by the United States Attorney's office in response to potential concerns about the defendant's treatment at MDC.

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

MDC's search procedures for the defendantCommunication between the defendant and their counselSafety measures in place for the defendant at MDC
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is an 'Information' filed by the United States Attorney in the Southern District of Flo...

The document is an 'Information' filed by the United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida, charging a defendant with crimes related to their activities as a mortgage broker. The defendant was registered as a mortgage broker and operated Mortgage Express, Inc., a Florida corporation with multiple offices. The charges are related to alleged violations of federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1341, 1344, and 2.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, requests that the court dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the s...

The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, requests that the court dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment as they charge the same offense twice, violating the Double Jeopardy Clause. The counts charge conspiracy to commit a crime against the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 371 with different underlying crimes. The filing applies a multifactor test to determine whether the conspiracies are the same offense.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-tr...

The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discuss...

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discussing the proposed redactions to court documents in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The parties have reached an agreement on redactions to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter. The Government is submitting its omnibus memorandum of law with proposed redactions under seal for the Court's consideration.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing submitted by the Acting United States Attorney, Audrey Strauss, and A...

The document is a court filing submitted by the Acting United States Attorney, Audrey Strauss, and Assistant United States Attorneys, arguing that the defendant's renewed bail motion should be denied due to the risk of flight. The court had previously found that the defendant poses a substantial actual risk of flight, and the government asserts that no conditions of bail can mitigate this risk. The motion is dated December 16, 2020.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The government argues that the indictment is valid and timely, contrary to the defendant's claims, c...

The government argues that the indictment is valid and timely, contrary to the defendant's claims, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3283 for the statute of limitations. The government also asserts that the defendant poses a significant risk of flight due to her international ties, financial resources, and lack of ties to the United States.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.