Multiple Defendants File Motions to Dismiss in 9/11 Terrorist Attacks Litigation
Summary
The passage merely lists a series of motions to dismiss by various corporate and charitable entities in a civil case related to 9/11. It provides no concrete evidence, financial details, or direct con Numerous entities (e.g., African Muslim Agency, Mar‑Jac Investments) are labeled as "SAAR Network De Plaintiffs have filed opposition briefs against these motions, indicating ongoing litigation. Refe
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Voluntary dismissal filing in Doe v. Trump (1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA) forwarded to House Oversight email
The passage merely confirms that a plaintiff‑named Jane Doe voluntarily dismissed a lawsuit against Donald Trump and co‑defendants. It provides no new allegations, financial details, or evidence of mi Case number 1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA filed in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff identified as Jane Doe. The suit was voluntarily dismissed under FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i).
9/11 Victims’ Plaintiffs Argue Material Support Claims Should Survive Statute‑of‑Limitations Challenges
The passage outlines procedural arguments in a 9/11‑related tort case, citing statutes of limitations and equitable tolling. It does not reveal new actors, financial flows, or undisclosed misconduct, Plaintiffs allege defendants provided knowing material support to al‑Qaeda that enabled 9/11 attacks The district court dismissed negligence, NIED, and intentional tort claims on statute‑of‑limitatio
Court opinion on Alien Tort Statute claims related to alleged material support for al‑Qaeda
The passage is a legal brief discussing procedural arguments and statutory interpretation. It does not introduce new factual leads, names of individuals, financial transactions, or undisclosed actors. Plaintiffs allege defendants funded al‑Qaeda in Sudan during the early 1990s. District court dismissed ATS claims for lack of alleged hijacking‑specific allegations. The brief argues ATS covers broad
Legal analysis of plaintiffs' claims linking defendants to September 11 attacks
The passage outlines potential causes of action (intentional infliction, trespass, negligence) against unnamed defendants for alleged assistance to 9/11 hijackers. It contains no specific names, dates Plaintiffs allege defendants aided or conspired with 9/11 terrorists. Claims include intentional infliction of emotional distress, trespass, and negligence. References to New York case law defining d
Appeal urges court to allow jurisdictional discovery into Saudi-linked sovereign defendants in 9/11 litigation
The passage indicates plaintiffs are seeking discovery to determine whether NCB (National Commercial Bank) and other defendants are instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which could expose f Plaintiffs argue NCB is an instrumentality of Saudi Arabia and request jurisdictional discovery. The appeal seeks reversal of dismissals of sovereign defendants under FSIA. Approximately 20 defendant
Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in Virginia Giuffre defamation case
The passage reveals a motion to keep certain filings confidential that contain allegations of sexual abuse by a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, on behalf of Virginia Giuffre. While it identifi Defendants Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell filed a response to Dershowitz’s motion to keep re The contested records are three filings that recount Virginia Giuffre’s allegations of sexual abus
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.