Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-29031House OversightOther

Cancer Survival Rate Exhibit Cited in Investment Strategy Report

The passage only presents statistical data on breast and prostate cancer survival rates and commentary on measurement methodology. It contains no allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑p Shows 10‑year survival rates for UK breast and prostate cancer from 1971 to 2011. Mentions potential mismeasurement and evolving productivity metrics. References Wall Street Journal article on slowin

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014550
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage only presents statistical data on breast and prostate cancer survival rates and commentary on measurement methodology. It contains no allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑p Shows 10‑year survival rates for UK breast and prostate cancer from 1971 to 2011. Mentions potential mismeasurement and evolving productivity metrics. References Wall Street Journal article on slowin

Tags

cancer-survivalhealth-statisticsproductivity-measurementinvestment-analysishouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Exhibit 15: 10-Year Net Survival Rate of Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients Improved cancer survival rates reflect significant gains in science and technology. % 100 - a fo} Nn a 2 Breast Cancer Data as of November 2014. 84 78 76 | 9 1 60 62 | 48 40 34 | | 1971-1972 1980-1981 1990-1991 2000-2001 2005-2006 2010-2011 1971-1972 1980-1981 1990-1991 2000-2001 2005-2006 2010-2011 Prostate Cancer Period of Diagnosis Note: Based on cancer statistics for the UK. Ten-year survival for 2005-2006 and 2010-2011 is predicted using an excess hazard statistical model. Source: Investment Strategy Group, Cancer Research UK. We conclude that there is undoubtedly some degree of mismeasurement. We know that information and communication technology has evolved significantly and innovation is occurring at a rapid pace. We know that the BEA reviews its statistical methodologies every five years and revises them as needed, recognizing that measurement methodologies have to evolve with the evolution of the US economy. We also know that we as consumers carry incredibly powerful digital equipment in the palms of our hands and pay less for it than we paid for equipment with lesser functionalities not so long ago. Common sense supplemented by extensive research by the experts on productivity and mismeasurement reinforces our view of a glass half-full when it comes to innovation and productivity in the US. We realize this debate will be resolved only with the benefit of hindsight, in the same way that realized productivity growth exceeded the We realize this debate will be resolved only with the benefit of hindsight, in the same way that realized productivity growth exceeded the prognostications of Hansen in the late 1930s and Krugman in the early 1990s. prognostications of Hansen in the late 1930s and Krugman in the early 1990s. Our clients will be inundated with conflicting views from headlines in the media and books with captivating titles. Separating fact from fiction remains challenging. Recently, an article in the Wall Street Journal highlighted “dwindling gains in science, technology and medicine.”*° The article suggested that improvements in breast cancer mortality have slowed since 1985. Exhibit 15 shows the 10-year net survival rate for breast cancer and prostate cancer since 1971. Maybe it is only a matter of perspective, but, to us, a 78% 10-year survival rate for breast cancer and an 84% 10-year survival rate for prostate cancer represent significant improvements over the rates of the early 1980s, 48% and 25%, respectively, and are even more significant for those whose lives have been saved. Probably one of the more amusing instances of conflicting perspectives can be seen in the 2016 publication of two books with diametrically opposed messages: Progress: Ten Reasons to Look Forward to the Future“ and The Innovation Illusion: How So Little Is Created by So Many Working So Hard, both written by authors born in Sweden in the early 1970s. Our views, of course, are more aligned with the first book. The second book, however, raises important concerns about excessive regulation and how Outlook | Investment Strategy Group 17

Related Documents (6)

House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Brief email exchange between Deepak Chopra and Jeffery E. with no substantive content

The document contains only a casual scheduling conversation and promotional text, lacking any names of officials, financial details, or actionable allegations. It offers no investigative leads. Email dated Nov 10, 2016 between Deepak Chopra and Jeffery E. Mentions meeting time and a new book title. Includes Chopra's address in Carlsbad, CA.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Psychological analysis of bystander effect and moral disengagement

Psychological analysis of bystander effect and moral disengagement The passage provides a generic discussion of bystander psychology with no specific individuals, transactions, dates, or actionable leads linking powerful actors to misconduct. It lacks novelty and investigative value. Key insights: Discusses classic studies by Darley and Latané on bystander behavior; Explores psychological mechanisms turning passive observers into perpetrators; Mentions concepts of dehumanization, moral disengagement, and empathy suppression

1p
House OversightUnknown

President Trump discusses Bob Woodward interview on phone, claims staff ignorance

President Trump discusses Bob Woodward interview on phone, claims staff ignorance The passage provides a brief anecdote of Trump’s phone call with journalist Bob Woodward, noting a claim that White House staff failed to inform him of the interview request. While it mentions a high‑profile figure (President Trump) and a senior aide (Kellyanne Conway), it lacks concrete details about wrongdoing, financial flows, or actionable leads. The information is already publicly reported and offers little novel investigative value. Key insights: Trump claims his staff did not tell him Woodward wanted an interview.; Kellyanne Conway is referenced as having asked Trump about a call.; Trump characterizes Woodward as "always been fair" but later calls the book inaccurate.

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01380343

Name allreitsklp Present Principal Occupation or Employment John J. Donahoe United States Function: Director. Board of Directors; Chair, Executive Committee; Co-Chair, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Professional Background: John Donahoe was elected to the Intel board of directors in March 2009. Donahoe has served as chairman of the board of PayPal Holdings Inc.. a technology platform company, since July 2015. He was president and CEO of eBay Inc., a global e- commerce co

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bill Siegel email chain discussing 'The Control Factor' and anti‑Islamic conspiracy narrative

The passage is an internal email and interview transcript promoting a conspiratorial worldview about 'Islamic Enemy' and 'Civilization Jihad.' It mentions Jeffrey Epstein as a sender but provides no c Email originates from Jeffrey Epstein's address, but only contains a casual invitation and a link to Bill Siegel outlines a theory called the 'Control Factor' that frames Islam as a coordinated threa

20p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.