Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-29070House OversightOther

Alleged grand jury questioning of Trump allies and personal life details

The passage contains unverified, anecdotal claims about prosecutors probing Trump, Cohen, Kushner, and Hicks, but provides no concrete names of investigators, dates, documents, or financial transactio Mentions prosecutors questioning Michael Cohen about resentment and potential leverage. References inquiries about Jared Kushner and Hope Hicks. Alleged focus on Trump's personal sexual behavior by t

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021134
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains unverified, anecdotal claims about prosecutors probing Trump, Cohen, Kushner, and Hicks, but provides no concrete names of investigators, dates, documents, or financial transactio Mentions prosecutors questioning Michael Cohen about resentment and potential leverage. References inquiries about Jared Kushner and Hope Hicks. Alleged focus on Trump's personal sexual behavior by t

Tags

hope-hickssteve-bannonjohn-dowdpotential-witness-leveragemueller-investigationjared-kushnermichael-cohentrumplegal-exposurehouse-oversightgrand-jurypersonal-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
20 MICHAEL WOLFF pursued by Trump for many years—pursued, in fact, well into the 2016 campaign—albeit never brought to fruition. Michael Cohen, Trump's personal lawyer and a Trump Organization officer, was another significant topic. The prosecutors asked questions about the level of Cohen's disappointment at not being included in the president's White House team. They seemed to be trying to gauge how much resentment Cohen felt, which led the witness to infer that they wanted to estimate how much leverage they might have if they attempted to flip Michael Cohen against the president. Zelinsky and Rhee wanted to know about Jared Kushner. And they wanted to know about Hope Hicks. ‘The two prosecutors also delved into the president’s personal life. How often did he cheat on his wife? With whom? How were trysts arranged? What were the president's sexual interests? The Mueller investigation, and its grand jury, was becoming a clearing house for the details of Trump's long history of professional and personal perfidiousness. When the long day was finally over, the witness left the grand jury room shocked—not so much by what the prosecutors wanted to know but by what they already knew. + By the third week of March, Trump's son-in-law had the president's full attention. “They can not only impeach you, they can bankrupt you” was Kushner’s message. Agitated and angry, Trump pressed Dowd for more reassurances, holding him accountable for the prior reassurances Trump had frequently demanded he be given. Dowd held firm: he yet believed that the fight was in its early stages and that Mueller was still on a fishing expedition. But Trump's patience was finally at an end. He decided that Dowd was a fool and should go back into the retirement from which, Trump kept repeating, he had rescued him. Indeed, resisting that retirement, Dowd pleaded his own case, assuring the president that he could continue to provide him with valuable help. To no avail: on March 22, Dowd reluc- tantly resigned, sending another bitter former Trumper into the world. = THE DO-OVER he day John Dowd was fired, Steve Bannon was sitting at his dinin; room table trying to forestall another threat to the Trump pres dency. This one wasn't about a relentless prosecutor but rather a betraye base. It was about the Wall that wasn't. The town houses on Capitol Hill, middle-class remnants of the nin teenth century, are cramped up-and-down affairs of modest parlor floo: nook-y sitting rooms, and small bedrooms. Many serve as headquarte for causes and organizations that can’t afford Washington's vast amou of standard-issue office real estate. Some double as housing for th: organization's leaders. Many represent amateur efforts or eccentric pt suits, often a kind of shrine to hopes and dreams and revolutions yet occur. The “Embassy” on A Street—a house built in 1890 and the form location of Bannon’s Breitbart News—was where Bannon had lived a worked since his exile from the White House in August 2017. It was p frat house, part man cave, and part pseudo-military redoubt; conspiré literature was scattered about. Various grave and underemployed you men, would-be militia members, loitered on the steps. The Embassy’s creepiness and dark heart were in quite stark contr to Bannon’s expansive and merry countenance. He might be in exile fr the Trump White House, but it was an ebullient banishment, coffee-fue or otherwise.

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01615944

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Steve Bannon"

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Jeffrey E." <I

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Steve Bannon <I

5p
House OversightUnknown

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests The conversation contains multiple actionable clues – a $100k invoice, references to a ‘cast’ for filming, mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, Michael Wolff, and Chinese market manipulation – that suggest a coordinated media or influence operation involving powerful political actors and foreign financial interests. While the specifics are vague, the repeated references to payments, legal arrangements, and government sensitivity provide concrete follow‑up leads (e.g., trace the $100k invoice, identify the production crew, locate the ‘letter to Burke’, and verify the alleged Chinese market influence). The content is moderately controversial and ties to high‑profile individuals, warranting further investigation. Key insights: Reference to sending an invoice for $100k to Darren – potential payment for services.; Discussion of assembling a ‘cast’ and filming on an island, with government interest in controlling press.; Mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, and Bannon in a context suggesting exploitation or coordinated messaging.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email hinting at media access to Trump circle and Saudi connections

The passage suggests a possible meeting between a media figure and Trump associates and mentions "Saudi friends," but provides no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It is a va Sender Jeffrey E. proposes meeting with an unnamed person in New York or on a plane. Reference to a Hollywood Reporter article about Steve Bannon and Trump Tower, implying insider knowl Alludes to a

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.