Skip to main content
Skip to content
Boilerplate confidentiality notice with no substantive contentGeneric Bank Oversight and Risk Management Narrative
Case File
d-29148House OversightOther

Attorney-Client Privilege Assertion in Miss Roberts Legal Representation

The excerpt mentions a privilege claim and a vague reference to a common interest agreement, but provides no concrete names, dates, financial details, or actionable leads involving high‑level official Miss Roberts' legal team asserts attorney‑client privilege. Question of whether communications with Miss Roberts are privileged. Reference to a possible common‑interest agreement, existence confirmed

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021861
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The excerpt mentions a privilege claim and a vague reference to a common interest agreement, but provides no concrete names, dates, financial details, or actionable leads involving high‑level official Miss Roberts' legal team asserts attorney‑client privilege. Question of whether communications with Miss Roberts are privileged. Reference to a possible common‑interest agreement, existence confirmed

Tags

common-interest-agreementlegal-procedureattorney-client-privilegelegal-exposurehouse-oversight
View on oversight.house.gov
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #021861

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 38 respect to confidential communications that were part of providing legal services to Miss Roberts, yes, I will be asserting -- well, she's -- let me be a little more precise. She will be asserting attorney/client privilege and I'm not at liberty to waive that for her. Q. And we will make a proffer later as to questions we would ask about your communications with Miss Roberts as we believe those are not privileged, but -- MR. SCOTT: As well as the others. MR. SIMPSON: As well as the others that have -- MR. SCOTT: Attorney/client. MR. SIMPSON: -- attorney/client the privilege has been asserted. BY MR. SIMPSON: Q. Let me go back to the common interest group. Is there any written agreement memorializing a common interest agreement? MS. McCAWLEY: I'm going to object to the extent that it seeks details of an agreement. You're allowed to know the existence of the agreement; he testified to that. The details, you're not entitled to. ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

DonateMore ways to support →
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.