Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-29433House OversightOther

Epstein Jane Doe lawsuits reveal family disputes and pending criminal case

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021524
Pages
1
Persons
6
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage repeats well‑known information about Epstein’s connections to high‑profile figures and ongoing lawsuits, but offers no new concrete evidence, transactions, or actionable leads. It mainly d Two Jane Doe lawsuits allege Epstein targeted economically disadvantaged girls in Palm Beach County. Family members are disputing involvement in the lawsuits, with a mother seeking to halt the case u

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

civil-lawsuitpalm-beachsexual-abusefamily-lawlegal-exposurehouse-oversightepsteinsexual-misconduct
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
{ D> EPSTEIN fom 1B $100, according to the lawsuit. The two attended the same Palm Beach County high school. Jane Doe No. 2 is now - 19.and living in Virginia, Her man said, Both lawsuits contend that Epstein, 55, targeted “economically disadvantaged girls from western Palm Beach County” who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities, or whose credibility would be quest:oned if they did. “Both complaints are full of lies,” said Guy Lewis, former US. attorney in Miami and ‘one of Epstein’s many attor- neys. Jane Doe No. 2's lawsuit “is an outrageous, defamatory copycat of the first.” There has been a twist in the first Jane Doe lawsuit. Her mother in Georgia contends that her former husband — Jane. Doe's father — con- sulted with neither of them before filing the lawsuit. She . is asking a judge to. halt the litigation until her daughter turns 18 in May and can make her own decisions. The mother asked in court filings to be added to the law- suit, saying she “has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain’ as a result of Epstein’s “reckless conduct.” Jane Doe “just didn’t want the lawsuit ‘going forward with the fathers involve- ment,” said Ted Leopold, the mother’s attorney. “She wanted to pursue it on her own. The father essentially did this on his own.” Jane Doe has’ béen es- tranged from her father since Thanksgiving, Leopold said. “That's why it's even stranger what he did,” he said. . The girls mother is asking a judge in their divorce case to find the father in contempt of court for violating their divorce decree by not con- ferring with her on a matter = SSS TT pommpe sani or Fagan | plaintiff's parents| at odds over suit | involving their daughter. “The father has sole custo- dy and has the right to make decisions on his daughter's rights,” Herman said. Epstein is a wealthy New York money manager who has counted Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and Britain's Prince Andrew among his friends.. He was the target of a lengthy investigation into his activities with girls by the Palm Beach Police Depart- ment that resulted in his in- dictment in July 2006 on one count of felony solicitation of prostitution. That case is pending. ; ’ Epstein has been sued in New York by a woman who says he had sex with her when she was 16. Herman : said he has received calls from others making the same | assertions in that state. Hetman convened a news conference Wednesday on the middle bridge connecting West Palm Beach and Palm Beach. “This is the bridge... these |} girls were recruited to come over and give a massage,” he said. “When they crossed this bridge, they had no idea what was in store for them, This is_ a bridge of tears.” Herman has described both Jane Does as typical teenage girls Epstein robbed of their innocence. But Harvard University law Professor Alan Dershowitz, another Epstein attorney, pro- vided the state attorney's of- fice with information gleaned from the myspace.com Web site two years ago showing that some of Epstein’s alleged victims boasted of their alco- hol and marijuana use. Herman said the girly backgrounds aren’t relevant {| to Epstein’s purported. be- havior. “They don’t have the mental capacity to consent to something like this with a grown man,” he said. @[email protected] ve

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

THE PALM BEACH POST

THE PALM BEACH POST • THURSDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2007 Milian sues billionaire investor, /says they had sex when she was 16 The Associated hers NEW YORK — A billionaire investor, already facing jail in Palm Beach County on charges of soliciting under- age prostitutes, is being sued by a young woman who says he had sex with her when she was 16 and had sought his help becoming a model. The lawsuit, fled late Thesday in Manhattan% state Supreme Court, says finan- cier Jeffrey Epstein had the teen perform a sex act when she brought photographs of herself for him to review in his Upper East Side mansion sometime in 2000. Epstein, 54, a money manager, told the teen he managed finances for Victoria's Secret and "could get you into the catalog" if she were "nice" to him, court papers say. The papers say being "nice" included massages and other favors. When the girl told Epstein, "I am 16 years old and just want to model," he replied, "Don't worry I won't tel

170p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING QUESTIONS RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERNING THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to admit or deny the following facts: BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48) (the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Cont

8p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct

The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C

55p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING QUESTIONS RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERNING THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to admit or deny the following facts: BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48) (the victims' "summary judgment motion") along with a Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Con

8p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

FBI Records Reveal Attempt to Delay Jeffrey Epstein’s Private Jet and Links to High‑Profile Figures

The documents contain multiple FBI internal memos and interview transcripts that detail a coordinated effort by FBI agents and U.S. Customs officials to delay a private jet (tail‑number N909JE) carryi FBI agent contacted DHS and ATC to explore delaying Epstein’s flight from St. Thomas (N909JE). CBP officers met the plane at the cargo entrance and verified Epstein was the sole passenger. The effort

80p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.