The government argues that the defendant's offer to renounce her French and British citizenship is a...
Summary
The government argues that the defendant's offer to renounce her French and British citizenship is a strategic move that does not guarantee extradition, as France's extradition laws are based on nationality at the time of the alleged crime, and the UK's extradition process is complex and uncertain.
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The government opposes the defendant's bail request, arguing that she has not provided sufficient fi...
The government opposes the defendant's bail request, arguing that she has not provided sufficient financial information and that her proposed bail package, secured by a foreign property, offers little to no security. The defendant is charged with serious crimes involving the sexual exploitation of minors and has extensive foreign ties, increasing her risk of flight.
The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant...
The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant poses a significant flight risk and that the government's case remains strong despite the defendant's pretrial motions. The court should deny the defendant's motion for bail due to the risk of flight and lack of new information.
The document argues that the defendant should be denied bail due to her access to significant financ...
The document argues that the defendant should be denied bail due to her access to significant financial resources and lack of ties to the United States, making her a flight risk. It also disputes the effectiveness of proposed bail conditions such as ankle-bracelet monitoring. The government cites previous cases to support its argument that electronic monitoring is not foolproof.
The defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell requests a two-week extension to file pretrial motions and mo...
The defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell requests a two-week extension to file pretrial motions and modify the briefing schedule due to COVID-19 restrictions and the large volume of discovery. The government consents to the requested extension. The proposed new deadlines are January 25, 2021, for the defendant's motions, February 26, 2021, for the government's response, and March 5, 2021, for the defendant's reply.
The document appears to be a court filing related to the sentencing of Paul M. Daugerdas, who was in...
The document appears to be a court filing related to the sentencing of Paul M. Daugerdas, who was involved in a tax shelter scheme. The government, led by Preet Bharara, is seeking restitution and has submitted evidence to support their claims. The defendant's counsel, Dennis J. Lerner, has also submitted filings in response.
The government opposes the defendant's request to modify a protective order to allow her to use disc...
The government opposes the defendant's request to modify a protective order to allow her to use discovery materials from the criminal case in related civil cases, citing concerns about witness privacy, third-party identifying information, and the confidentiality of the ongoing grand jury investigation.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.