The document argues that the defendant should be denied bail due to her access to significant financ...
Summary
The document argues that the defendant should be denied bail due to her access to significant financial resources and lack of ties to the United States, making her a flight risk. It also disputes the effectiveness of proposed bail conditions such as ankle-bracelet monitoring. The government cites previous cases to support its argument that electronic monitoring is not foolproof.
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The document is a court filing submitted by the Acting United States Attorney, Audrey Strauss, and A...
The document is a court filing submitted by the Acting United States Attorney, Audrey Strauss, and Assistant United States Attorneys, arguing that the defendant's renewed bail motion should be denied due to the risk of flight. The court had previously found that the defendant poses a substantial actual risk of flight, and the government asserts that no conditions of bail can mitigate this risk. The motion is dated December 16, 2020.
The United States Attorney's office submits a response opposing the defendant's third bail motion, a...
The United States Attorney's office submits a response opposing the defendant's third bail motion, arguing that the proposed bail conditions are insufficient to mitigate the risk of flight. The government contends that the court should deny the motion due to the defendant's continued risk of flight. The document is signed by Audrey Strauss, United States Attorney, and several Assistant United States Attorneys.
The document is a court filing by the United States Attorney's office arguing that the defendant is ...
The document is a court filing by the United States Attorney's office arguing that the defendant is a flight risk and should be denied bail. The government submits that there are no conditions of bail that would assure the defendant's presence in court proceedings. The filing is signed by Assistant United States Attorneys Alison G. Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey.
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-tr...
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.
The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discuss...
The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discussing the proposed redactions to court documents in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The parties have reached an agreement on redactions to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter. The Government is submitting its omnibus memorandum of law with proposed redactions under seal for the Court's consideration.
The government argues that the indictment is valid and timely, contrary to the defendant's claims, c...
The government argues that the indictment is valid and timely, contrary to the defendant's claims, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3283 for the statute of limitations. The government also asserts that the defendant poses a significant risk of flight due to her international ties, financial resources, and lack of ties to the United States.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.