Court Dismisses RICO, TVPA, and ATA Claims Against Various Defendants
Summary
The passage merely outlines legal rulings dismissing claims and cites precedent; it provides no new allegations, financial flows, or connections to powerful actors that could be investigated. Plaintiffs' RICO claims dismissed for lack of central involvement. TVPA claims dismissed against several Saudi banks and individuals. ATA civil remedy requirements explained; no actionable allegations present
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Legal filing outlines pleading requirements for 9/11 survivors' lawsuits under RICO, TVPA, and Anti‑Terrorism statutes
The passage merely recites procedural standards and statutory elements for various causes of action (RICO, TVPA, ATA, New York tort claims) without naming specific defendants, financial transactions, Survivors' complaints alleged bank and charitable networks may have assisted al Qaeda but failed to TVPA claims were dismissed because plaintiffs did not allege actions by individuals under color of
Court Opinion on Personal Jurisdiction in Post‑9/11 Terrorism Lawsuits
The passage is a standard legal analysis of jurisdictional standards in civil actions arising from the September 11 attacks. It cites case law and statutes but provides no new factual allegations, nam Discusses applicability of FSIA, ATA, and Rule 4(k)(2) for personal jurisdiction. Emphasizes need for plaintiffs to show direct involvement of defendants in alleged wrongdoing. References prior terro
Court dismisses multiple defendants in SAAR Network terrorism financing lawsuits
The passage outlines procedural dismissals of claims that various organizations and individuals funded terrorist groups via the SAAR Network. It provides specific entity names, alleged money‑launderin Defendants include African Muslim Agency, Grove Corporate, Heritage Education Trust, International I Plaintiffs allege these entities were co‑conspirators, material sponsors, or aiders/abettors of th
Procedural appellate review of 9/11 terrorism support lawsuits
The document outlines jurisdictional and procedural issues in appellate review of existing 9/11 lawsuits, without revealing new allegations, financial flows, or specific powerful actors. It offers lim Plaintiffs allege material support to al‑Qaeda by five defendants under the Anti‑Terrorism Act. Multiple defendants were dismissed in prior district‑court orders (2005‑2010). Appeals were filed in Au
This document is Plaintiff Jane Doe's response to the first set of interrogatories propounded by Def...
This document is Plaintiff Jane Doe's response to the first set of interrogatories propounded by Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The response includes objections and answers based on currently available information, with a preliminary statement noting that the responses are not admissions and are subject to further investigation and discovery. The case is a civil lawsuit related to allegations against Jeffrey E. Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Plaintiffs seek damages over business reputation loss from defendants Tyler McDonald d/b/a Yi.Org
The filing is a routine civil suit seeking modest damages (>$15,000) for alleged reputational harm. It involves no high‑profile individuals, government agencies, or novel allegations, offering little Plaintiffs allege reputational damage caused by Tyler McDonald operating as Yi.Org. Requested relief includes damages exceeding $15,000 and a jury trial. Attorney for plaintiffs is Joe Titone, Florid
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.