Internal government email discussing handling of Jeffrey Epstein civil case documents and attorney fees
Summary
The passage reveals a federal official (likely from the Department of Justice) coordinating with a private attorney about limiting access to indictment and plea agreement materials in the Epstein case Email from Ann Marie C. Villafana (USAFLS) to DOJ counsel Jay Lefkowitz about conference call with a Discussion of providing limited sections of a plea agreement (paragraphs 7‑10) to the defense team
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Jeffrey Epstein email chain to Jay Lefkowitz requesting interview questions about his post‑conviction activities and ties to high‑profile figures
The passage reveals a direct request from a government‑affiliated lawyer (Jay Lefkowitz, former White House counsel) to interview Epstein, probing his ongoing business, scientific foundation, connecti Email dated March 7 2011 from Jeffrey Epstein to Jay Lefkowitz, a former White House counsel. Alexandra Wolfe (likely a journalist or researcher) asks Lefkowitz to arrange a phone or email inter Ques
Email chain linking Jeffrey Epstein and Tom Pritzker discussing Penny Pritzker's $80 million income understatement
The passage provides a concrete lead – an internal email referencing a Washington Post story about Penny Pritzker understating $80 million in income and includes correspondence between Tom Pritzker an Penny Pritzker allegedly understated her income by $80 million in government disclosures. Tom Pritzker (likely a relative) communicated about the issue with Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein’s email signature
Affidavit alleges Jeffrey Epstein secured a non‑prosecution agreement with the federal government, shielding him from criminal liability for allege...
The passage provides a concrete claim that Epstein entered a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with the federal government, limiting criminal exposure for roughly thirty victims and allowing a civil cap Affidavit filed by lead counsel Bradley James Edwards in Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein (SDFL, case #08 Alleges Epstein signed a non‑prosecution agreement with the federal government covering ~30 minor
Email chain referencing review of Jeffrey Epstein non‑prosecution agreement by U.S. Attorney’s Office
The passage shows internal DOJ communication about a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) involving Jeffrey Epstein, linking senior DOJ staff (Jay Lefkowitz) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney. While the exist Jay Lefkowitz (former DOJ official) is reviewing the Epstein NPA. Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann Marie Villafana is the point of contact for the agreement. The email references a PDF titled “Epstein Non
Internal email chain discussing concealment of Epstein plea details and limiting disclosure to senior officials
The passage reveals an internal effort to keep a signed document—presumably related to Jeffrey Epstein’s guilty plea—confidential, with instructions to limit knowledge to a few named individuals. It m Email dated 09/24/2007 references a signed copy of a document involving Mr. Epstein’s guilty plea. Jay Lefkowitz explicitly asks the recipient to keep the matter from becoming public. Instructions to
Miami Herald alleges federal government gave Jeffrey Epstein "valuable consideration" for information in 2013 plea deal
The passage suggests the U.S. government provided undisclosed benefits to Epstein in exchange for information, hinting at a possible quid‑pro‑quo that could explain his lenient sentencing. It names sp Federal government allegedly gave Epstein "valuable consideration" for information provided to the F The consideration was noted in sealed documents related to Maxwell’s case. Epstein’s plea deal and
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.