Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-29779House OversightOther

Plaintiffs seek court order to compel Alan Dershowitz to produce alleged documents and waive privilege in Edwards v. Dershowitz case

The passage details a procedural motion to force production of documents that the plaintiffs claim would prove Dershowitz never met a certain Jane Doe. While it identifies a high‑profile attorney, it Plaintiffs allege Dershowitz has 45 days to produce documents proving he never met Jane Doe No. 3 bu Dershowitz claims various privileges but has not filed a privilege log. The motion requests a cour

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014096
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage details a procedural motion to force production of documents that the plaintiffs claim would prove Dershowitz never met a certain Jane Doe. While it identifies a high‑profile attorney, it Plaintiffs allege Dershowitz has 45 days to produce documents proving he never met Jane Doe No. 3 bu Dershowitz claims various privileges but has not filed a privilege log. The motion requests a cour

Tags

legal-feesdocument-productionprivilege-waivercivil-litigationalan-dershowitzlegal-exposurehouse-oversightdiscovery-dispute

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 319-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2015 Page 13 of 34 Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents Response to Requests for Production 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23. To permit the Court to review the extent of Dershowitz’s evasions, a copy of his responses is attached to this pleading as Exhibit A. In short, despite having had 45 days to gather materials that allegedly provide “absolute proof” that he has never even met Jane Doe No. 3 — and despite having told numerous media sources that he had already collected such information — Dershowitz has produced none of these documents to Edwards and Cassell. He has also made blanket assertions of a variety of privileges, but has produced no privilege logs. CONCLUSION Accordingly, Edwards and Cassell request: 1. That Dershowitz be directed to produce all materials covered by the discovery requests forthwith; 2. That Dershowitz be held to have waived any and all otherwise applicable privileges as a consequence of his failure to timely file a privilege log; and 3. That Dershowitz be ordered to pay reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees associated with the need to file this motion to compel. CERTIFICATE OF GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO RESOLVE Plaintiffs have attempted in good faith to resolve the discovery issues presented in this motion (and others) as evidenced by the letter attached as Exhibit B. The Defendant has failed to respond as of the time of the filing of this motion.

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation

The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz repeatedly asserted on national TV that he possessed travel, credit‑card and other records proving he never met Jane Doe #3, yet has failed to produce any such Dershowitz claimed on Fox Business (Jan 7 2015) and CNN (Jan 5 2015) to have "all kinds of records" Despite a 45‑day deadline, he produced no documents and responded only with boilerplate objections

26p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz claims he can disprove sexual abuse allegations via flight and travel records

The passage provides a specific lead that Alan Dershowitz asserted he possesses flight and travel records that could refute a Jane Doe's abuse claim. It mentions media appearances and suggests documen Dershowitz said he can prove he never met Jane Doe No. 3 using flight and travel records. He stated the investigation would take about an hour to disprove the allegation. The claim was repeated on CN

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01368193

Page 20 of 32 The motion claimed that the woman. who was not identified in court documents, had sexual relations as a minor with Prince Andrew in London. New York and on Mr. Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Mr. Epstein told the woman to give the prince 'Whatever he demanded" and 'report back to him on the details? the motion said. Buckingham Palace took the unusual step of issuing a statement to rebut the accusations "This relates to longstanding and ongoing civil procee

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Court filings reveal alleged non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and references to high‑profile political figures

The document contains sworn declarations and court orders that reference a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, claims that the U.S. Government concealed it from victims, and m Petitioners allege the Government violated victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act by hi Court order strikes detailed allegations but acknowledges they exist in the filings. Jane Doe 3’s

17p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] testimony and filings implicate Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in alleged sex‑trafficking ...

The document combines a sworn complaint, detailed deposition excerpts, and internal communications that directly name high‑profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, former U.S. President‑li Giuffre alleges Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz were among the men she was forced to service for E The complaint states Epstein’s 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) barred federal charges against

47p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Plaintiffs seek court order to compel Alan Dershowitz to produce documents allegedly proving innocence in alleged minor sexual abuse case

The filing indicates a dispute over undisclosed documents that could contain evidence related to a high‑profile sexual abuse allegation involving a well‑known attorney. While it flags a potential lead Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz claims to have "absolute proof" of non‑abuse but has not produced the d Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel production after a 45‑day delay. The case is filed in Broward

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.