Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-29866House OversightOther

Court transcript excerpt showing procedural dispute over summary judgment arguments

The passage merely records a procedural discussion in a court hearing with no specific names, transactions, or substantive allegations linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers minimal investig Plaintiff allegedly failed to respond to summary judgment arguments. Defendant seeks to preclude evidence of a prior statement. Judge appears uncertain about the status of a partial summary judgment.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011395
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage merely records a procedural discussion in a court hearing with no specific names, transactions, or substantive allegations linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers minimal investig Plaintiff allegedly failed to respond to summary judgment arguments. Defendant seeks to preclude evidence of a prior statement. Judge appears uncertain about the status of a partial summary judgment.

Tags

legal-exposurelitigation-tacticshouse-oversightsummary-judgmentcourt-proceedings

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 92 H3vlgiu2 statement and later a press release which said, we stand by everything we said. It's directly on point. Your Honor there held that such republication is not actionable. We set forth that clearly in our argument 4 of the summary judgment motion, and plaintiff, in her response to summary judgment, made absolutely no reference, no response, nothing with respect to that argument. We, therefore, believe that she has conceded the point and we would ask that no evidence regarding that statement b ntered in the trial. We predicted, and we were correct, that having not argued it in response to our summary judgment motion, they would try to use the opportunity of their response to this motion in limine to make substantive arguments. They should not be permitted to do so, your Honor. In any event, their arguments that they have set forth in response -- r THE COURT: I'ma little lost. Perhaps totally lost. But the partial summary judgment, that's not been dealt with, or has it? MS. MENNINGER: It was not part of your Honor's ruling; ne. THE COURT: Tell me the context of the summary judgment. MS. MENNINGER: Certainly, your Honor. There were a number of things that we believed plaintiff had conceded because they failed to respond to our requests in our summary SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(212) 805-0300
Wire Refreference

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.