Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-29869House OversightOther

Analysis of OLC's Interpretation of the CVRA Victim Definition

The passage discusses a legal argument about the definition of "victim" under the Crime Victims' Rights Act and critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's reading. It does not introduce new allegations, OLC argues that CVRA victim status attaches only after a criminal complaint is filed. The author contends that the Department must identify victims earlier, citing the Victims' Rights an Reference to

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014055
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage discusses a legal argument about the definition of "victim" under the Crime Victims' Rights Act and critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's reading. It does not introduce new allegations, OLC argues that CVRA victim status attaches only after a criminal complaint is filed. The author contends that the Department must identify victims earlier, citing the Victims' Rights an Reference to

Tags

office-of-legal-counsellegal-interpretationlegal-analysishouse-oversightpolicy-compliancecvravictims-rights

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
76 CASSELL ET AL. [Vol. 104 invokes the CVRA’s definition of crime “victim,” its legislative intent, and its structure, a closer reading of each demonstrates little support for the notion that crime victims must await the formal filing of charges before accruing CVRA rights. A. OLC’S MISREADING OF THE CVRA’S DEFINITION OF “VICTIM” OLC’s lead argument is that the CVRA’s definition of “victim” presupposes that criminal charges have been formally filed.8* The CVRA defines a “victim” who is protected as “a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense.”** Focusing on the word “offense,” OLC concedes that it does not “conclusively resolve” the question of when rights attach. Nevertheless, OLC claims that the word “naturally suggests that a person’s status as a ‘crime victim’ can only be determined after there has been a formal decision to charge a defendant with a particular Federal offense.”*? OLC goes on to elaborate: Under this reading, the earliest that a “crime victim” under the Act could be identified would be upon the filing of a criminal complaint—that is, at the earliest point at which there is a sworn written statement of probable cause to believe that a particular defendant committed an identified Federal offense and hence the first point at which it is possible with any certainty to identify a “crime victim” directly and proximately harmed by the commission of that offense.*° OLC is disingenuous in asserting that the “first point” at which a person has been harmed by a federal crime arises only after a criminal complaint has been filed. The Department routinely makes such determinations at earlier points in criminal cases, such as when it sends a “target letter” to a defense attorney during a grand jury investigation.*’ Indeed, OLC remarkably ignores the fact that the Department is directly required to identify victims of a crime before the filing of a criminal complaint, both by statute and through internal policy directives. The Victims’ Rights and Restitution Act of 1990 (VRRA)*® requires the Department to identify victims before the filing of a criminal complaint. 83 OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 6. 84 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e) (2012) (emphasis added). 85 OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 5. 8° Td. 87 A target letter explains the procedural process underlying an indictment and places the defendant on notice of the general nature of the government’s criminal investigation. See U.S. DEp’T oF JusticE, TITLE 9: U.S. ATTORNEYS’ CRIMINAL RESOURCE MANUAL § 160, [heremafter CRIMINAL RESOURCE MANUAL] available at http://goo.g1/YHLDke (providing an example target letter); infra Part III.A (developing this point further). 88 Pub. L. No. 101-647, 104 Stat. 4820 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 10601, 10606-07 (2006)).

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

URLhttp://goo.g1/YHLDke

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.