Edwards Opposes Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment
Summary
The passage is a routine procedural argument in a civil case involving Jeffrey Epstein and Bradley Edwards. It provides no new factual allegations, financial flows, or links to powerful officials beyo Bradley Edwards argues Epstein cannot invoke the Fifth Amendment as both a sword and a shield. Cites Florida case law to support denial of Epstein's summary judgment motion. No new evidence of wrongd
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...
The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive
Edwards Opposes Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment in Abuse of Process Case
The passage outlines procedural arguments in a civil litigation between Bradley Edwards and Jeffrey Epstein, but provides no concrete new evidence, financial flows, or high‑level political connections Edwards claims Epstein filed claims without probable cause and engaged in abusive process. The opposition cites specific depositions (Oct 10, 2013 and May 15, 2013) and a judge’s date (Mar 29 Edwards
Defendant Bradley Edwards files transcript of Virginia Roberts interview in Epstein civil case
The document is a routine notice of filing a transcript in a civil lawsuit. It does not reveal new allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. The only potentially relevant n Bradley Edwards, a defendant, submitted a transcript of a phone interview with Virginia Roberts. The filing is part of a counter‑claim seeking punitive damages in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The notice
Bradley Edwards' Defense Letter Claims Jeffrey Epstein Filed Frivolous Lawsuit to Extort Attorney and Suppress Victim Testimony
The document outlines a detailed legal argument that Epstein used a civil suit against attorney Bradley Edwards as a tactic to intimidate and silence victims of his sexual abuse. It names high‑profile Epstein sued attorney Bradley Edwards despite no evidence of fraud, allegedly to extort Edwards and The complaint alleges Edwards ‘pumped’ victim cases to investors in a scheme linked to Scott Roths
Bradley Edwards' civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein highlights Fifth Amendment refusals and seeks testimony from Epstein's high‑profile friends
The passage outlines a civil litigation strategy that hinges on forcing disclosure from Epstein’s social circle, suggesting a possible investigative path to identify and subpoena individuals who may c Edwards is pursuing discovery of Epstein’s friends who might confirm abuse allegations. Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment, prompting adverse inference arguments. Legal precedent cited to
Witness claims to have knowledge of alleged Epstein‑related investigations and asserts no sexual misconduct, referencing Bradley Edwards, Paul Cass...
The passage provides a potential lead that a witness (likely a former associate of Jeffrey Epstein) claims to possess privileged information about investigations by high‑profile private investigators Witness asserts they never had sexual contact with Virginia Roberts or any underage girls. Claims knowledge of what investigators Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell gathered. References a letter from M
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.