Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-30220House OversightOther

Alleged 1991 Conversation Between Clarence Thomas, Orrin Hatch, and Alan Simpson About Anita Hill Allegations

The passage claims a private, unrecorded conversation in 1991 where senior Republican officials allegedly acknowledged the truth of Anita Hill's allegations. It provides no verifiable evidence, dates, Alleged informal meeting on Oct. 5, 1991, one week after Senate Judiciary Committee vote on Thomas. Participants: Clarence Thomas (future Justice), Sen. Orrin Hatch, Sen. Alan Simpson. Claimed discus

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #025202
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage claims a private, unrecorded conversation in 1991 where senior Republican officials allegedly acknowledged the truth of Anita Hill's allegations. It provides no verifiable evidence, dates, Alleged informal meeting on Oct. 5, 1991, one week after Senate Judiciary Committee vote on Thomas. Participants: Clarence Thomas (future Justice), Sen. Orrin Hatch, Sen. Alan Simpson. Claimed discus

Tags

historical-allegationhistorical-testimonysexual-harassmentanita-hillpolitical-influencerepublican-senatesupreme-courthouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Sent: 9/18/2018 10:40:13 PM To: paul krassner [ Subject: Re: deja’ vu' by pk great On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:48 PM, paul krassner <_ wrote: Why I Leaked the Anita Hill Affidavit I shall identify myself only as a female aide to a Republican senator. It is also relevant that I have long nurtured a keen interest in psycho-history, the process by which a nation’s direction is interpreted as an extension of the psychological makeup of those individuals who govern it. Without going into specific detail, let me simply state that on October 5, 1991, I happened to hear part of a conversation among Judge—now Supreme Court Justice—Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch and Senator Alan Simpson. The three were meeting informally one week after the Judiciary Committee voted, first 7-7, then 13-1, to recommend the confirmation of Judge Thomas, and one day after the full Senate indicated that he would be confirmed. The conversation I happened to hear had to do with those charges brought by Anita Hill and ignored by the members of the committee, both Democratic and Republican. At that point in time I still thought this was an appropriate response, because the alternative would have been to hold an executive session, and Judge Thomas would then have had no practical choice but to resort to heavy denial. Now, however, these men were, in a jocular fashion, acknowledging the truth of what would turn out to be Professor Hill’s allegations. Senator Simpson was saying, “Y’know, Clarence, I’ve seen some pretty raunchy porno movies in my time, but I never did see one where a lady was having sex with an animal.” “T’ll never forget it,” Judge Thomas replied in his riveting sonorous tone. “They were in a barn. Except that the inside of the barn was like a theater.” Senator Hatch interjected, “Summer stock, eh? No pun intended”

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alleged 1991 Senate Conversation Between Clarence Thomas, Orrin Hatch, and Alan Simpson Describing Explicit Animal Scene

The passage presents a sensational, unverified anecdote about a private conversation involving high‑profile officials. It lacks corroborating evidence, dates, or concrete leads (no documents, recordin Claims a 1991 informal meeting where Thomas, Hatch, and Simpson discussed Anita Hill allegations in Alleged decision by an unnamed female aide to leak Anita Hill’s affidavit to NPR’s Nina Totenberg.

3p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02622881

3p
House OversightUnknown

Alleged British Intelligence (Tavistock) and LaRouche Network Ties to 1950s Pornography and 1970s Anti‑Nuclear Protest Briefings

Alleged British Intelligence (Tavistock) and LaRouche Network Ties to 1950s Pornography and 1970s Anti‑Nuclear Protest Briefings The passage links a historic British intelligence institute (Tavistock) to U.S. political activist Lyndon LaRouche’s private intelligence network and claims they briefed state police on a 1970s anti‑nuclear protest. It provides specific names and a concrete event, offering a potential investigative angle (e.g., archival search for Tavistock‑related projects, LaRouche intelligence files, police briefing records). However, the claims are vague, lack dates, documents, or transaction details, and the Tavistock‑pornography connection is a long‑standing conspiracy trope, reducing novelty and verifiability. Key insights: Paul Krassner allegedly recruited by the Tavistock Institute in the early 1950s for pornographic satire.; Lyndon LaRouche’s private intelligence network reportedly briefed a state police lieutenant before a 1970s Seabrook nuclear plant protest.; The U.S. Labor Party’s newsletter was allegedly subscribed to by police departments nationwide.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alleged British Intelligence (Tavistock) and LaRouche Network Ties to 1950s Pornography and 1970s Anti‑Nuclear Protest Briefings

The passage links a historic British intelligence institute (Tavistock) to U.S. political activist Lyndon LaRouche’s private intelligence network and claims they briefed state police on a 1970s anti‑n Paul Krassner allegedly recruited by the Tavistock Institute in the early 1950s for pornographic sat Lyndon LaRouche’s private intelligence network reportedly briefed a state police lieutenant before

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: paul krassner

2p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02630991

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.