Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-30362House OversightFinancial Record

Saudi market earnings trends and low foreign fund allocation analysis

The passage provides market data and commentary on Saudi equity performance and fund allocation, without specific names, transactions, or allegations involving high‑profile actors. It offers limited i Saudi ERRs show more upgrades than downgrades despite earnings downgrades. GEM fund allocation to Saudi Arabia is only 0.25% of total AUM, far below potential MSCI EM weight. Potential economic diver

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #016154
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides market data and commentary on Saudi equity performance and fund allocation, without specific names, transactions, or allegations involving high‑profile actors. It offers limited i Saudi ERRs show more upgrades than downgrades despite earnings downgrades. GEM fund allocation to Saudi Arabia is only 0.25% of total AUM, far below potential MSCI EM weight. Potential economic diver

Tags

cma-reformsfinancial-flowntp-programequity-marketsfund-allocationmarket-analysissaudi-arabiahouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Chart 49: Saudi ERR’s are showing signs of inflecting despite one of the most protracted periods of earnings downgrades. 2 160 i 140 16 - More upgrades than downgrades 120 1.4 12 100 1 80 0.8 + 60 0.6 40 0.4 More downgrades than upgrades 0.2 - 20 0 0 | |-uer Z|-uer e]-uer pl-uer G|-uer g|-uer ————ERR (LHS) —==Brent Crude (US$/bbI- RHS) Source: DataStream, I/B/E/S, Bloomberg, BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research Off benchmark and out of mind? Growing confidence could drive rerating With Saudi Arabia remaining off benchmark (it is not currently part of any major indices such as the MSCI EM or FM), GEM funds allocation to Saudi Arabia remains relatively low at just 0.25% (of total GEMs AUM). Whilst allocation levels are relatively high versus history, they are still significantly below the levels implied by MSCI EM inclusion (1.4%) or suggesting a level of apathy towards the market. Chart 50: GEM fund allocation in Saudi (asset-weighted)* 0.35 7 % GEM funds, allocation in Saudi MSCI Saudi market cap as % of MSCI EM (rhs) %r 16 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Source: EPFR, BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research.*Market cap as % of MSCI EM represents and artificially constructed benchmark weight assuming that this market was a member of MSCI EM index With the NTP looking to diversify the Saudi economy away from the oil sector (and reduce its reliance on a higher oil prices), we believe confidence in the longer term economic outlook could improve, ultimately driving earnings momentum and a market rerating. Given our view that crude oil prices will likely post growing momentum in 2017, moving substantially above USS50/bbl, even a partial success of the NTP program would likely be sufficient to improve market confidence. CMA reforms (likely linked to the NTP), a potential catalyst for market rerating Furthermore, reforms being introduced by the Saudi Capital Markets Authority (CMA) to attract greater foreign participation in the Saudi market (see below) indicate Saudi is 44 GEMs Paper #26 | 30 June 2016 OS Merrill Lynch

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.