Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-30515House OversightOther

Backyard meeting with alleged lawyer and discussion of Jeffrey Epstein relationship

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #012551
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals a personal meeting in the witness's home where the witness allegedly disclosed a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein to an unidentified lawyer. This provides a concrete location, pot Meeting took place in the witness's backyard in Western Palm Beach County Unannounced appearance of a woman identified as a victim's rights representative or lawyer Witness claims to have disclosed a

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

personal-relationshipfloridajeffrey-epsteinpotential-witness-testimonylegal-representationpotential-witnesslegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightvictims-rights
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
sensor & Associates Page 6 Q Okay, go ahead. A The first one was a guy, I'm not sure of his name. And then there's another one that had -- another lady with the victim's rights. fe) She was victim's right representative? A Yes. Q We talked about a lawyer by the name "Marie Villafona;" do you know whether she was present during any of those meetings? A I'm not sure of the name. Q The first time that you met with Nesbith, where did that take place? A Here, in my backyard. Q In your backyard, at your home in Western Palm Beach County, right? A Yes. Q Did she announce to you that she was coming, or did she just show up? A She showed up. Q Unannounced? A Yes. Q During that time, I assume that you told her about your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and any contact you've had with him, correct? A Correct. nen occ oe Ee roe Ph. 561.682.0905 - Fax. 561.6 ar nt Eg rch ted nb ed ne Mea EEE a aD NE Eh TD 82.1771 "1655 Palfh Beach Lakes’Blvd;, Suité 500°- West ‘Palin Beach, FL’ 33401 “ro

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER RENEWED MOTION FOR BAIL Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim New York, NY 10011 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00094289 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 ARGUMENT 7 I. Reconsideration of the Court's Bail Decision is Appropriate Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(O 7 II. Ms. Maxwell Should Be Granted Bail Under the Proposed Strict Bail Conditions 10 A. Ms. Maxwell Has Deep Family Ties to the United States and Numerous Sureties to Support Her Bond 10 1. Ms. Maxwell is Devoted to Her Spouse and Stepchildren and Would Never Destroy Her Family By Leaving th

45p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United States Attorney's Office in Miami (the "USAO"), not only has it has remained unwilling to address these issues, but Mr. Epstein's defense counsel has been instructed to limit its contact to the very prosecutors who are the subject of this misconduct complaint. For your review, this document summarizes the USAO's conduct in this case. Background 1. In March 2005, the Palm Beach Police Department opened a criminal investigation of Palm Beach resident, Jeffrey E. Epstein. The press has widely reported that Mr. Epstein is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton. 2. In July 2006, after an intensive probe, including interviews of dozens of witnesses, re

11p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

z/zWo 1 keicc5bir+ -tv

z/zWo 1 keicc5bir+ -tv EFTA00087617 LAW OFFICES OF GERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.G. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION NEW YORK, NEW YORE 10OE1 GERALD B. LEFCOURT SHERYL E. REICH RENATO C. STABILE A. FRIEDMAN VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Assistant United States Attorney Office of the United States Attorney Southern District $ f Fl. rid West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Dear TELEPHONE FACSIMILE February 23, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Thank you once again for meeting with us regarding our client, Jeffrey Epstein. As you know, in advance of last Tuesday's meeting we provided you with the recorded interviews of various witnesses taken in the state's investigation. At the meeting, we disclosed that, as part of our own preparation, we made working transcripts of these recordings. You have asked for copies of the transcripts and we have discussed various ways that that might be accomplished without compromising Mr. Epstein's position and rights. To assist in your bringing this investigation to a c

94p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co

40p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' To: " Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - FBI Daily News Briefing - July 31, 2023 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:57:36 +0000 Importance: Normal Hello Can I request to add my ASACs to this distro list? From: FBI News Briefing Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 6:15:04 AM To: FBINewsBriefing < Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - FBI Daily News Briefing - July 31, 2023 View In Browser P,Federal Bureau of Investigation - Seal July 31, 2023 Federal Bureau of Investigation Daily News Briefing (In coordination with the Office of Public Affairs) Email Public Affairs to subscribe to the Daily News Briefing. Mobile version and archive available here. Table of Contents IN THE NEWS • Suicide Bomber at Political Rally in Northwest Pakistan Kills at Least 44 People, Wounds Nearly 200 • Russia Says Two Drones Hit Buildings in Moscow in Latest Wave of Attacks • West African Leaders Threaten Force Against Niger Plotters • U.S. Nurse, Child Abducted in Haiti, Non-Profit Organization Says • How N

27p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C.

MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. ATTORNEY AT MW 20 PARK PLAZA, SUITE 1000 ROSTON, MASSACUUSEITS 02116 FAX NIGHT EAIERGRNCV: Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. July 22, 2011 Roy Black forwarded to me your letter to him dated July 21, 2011, from the District Attorney of the County of New York. We thank you for providing notice of the intended disclosure but we do object to any disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and the related list of witness/victims on the basis of the confidentiality provisions of paragraph 13. Absent an enforceable subpoena - which we would have the right to move to quash in the Court from which it was issued - there exists no right or duty to disclose the confidential Non-Prosecution Agreement or the non-public witness/victim list which was referenced in paragraph 7 of the NPA. Further, given th

68p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.