Attorney files affirmation supporting motion to unseal appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal
Summary
The passage reveals a procedural move to unseal court filings in a high‑profile Epstein case, potentially exposing prosecutorial conduct and law‑enforcement decisions. While it points to specific acto Affirmation filed by John M. Browning, attorney for NYP Holdings, publisher of the New York Post Motion seeks to unseal appellate briefs in the Jeffrey Epstein appeal (NY County Index No. 30129/10) E
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Judge Upholds Jeffrey Epstein’s Level‑Three Sex Offender Designation Amid Sealed Appeal Briefs
The passage reveals that the appellate briefs in Epstein’s challenge to his sex‑offender classification were filed under seal, indicating potential undisclosed evidence or victim identities. While it Justice Ruth Pickholz rejected a lower designation and cited unusual prosecutorial tactics. ADA Gaffney admitted she had never spoken to federal investigators who concluded Epstein was a seria Epstei
Palm Beach Post editorial alleges prosecutor bias and Dershowitz involvement in Jeffrey Epstein sex crime case
The passage links high‑profile individuals – State Attorney Barry Krischer, Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, and financier Jeffrey Epstein – to possible prosecutorial misconduct and a grand‑jury ref State Attorney Barry Krischer referred Epstein case to a grand jury rather than a jury trial. Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz reportedly met with prosecutors to challenge the credibility o Epst
Bradley J. Edwards Seeks Summary Judgment Claiming Absolute Immunity in Jeffrey Epstein Lawsuit
The passage reveals a legal strategy to shield an attorney from liability in a case brought by Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting possible undisclosed misconduct or defamatory statements tied to a high‑profi Attorney Bradley J. Edwards invokes absolute immunity to block claims by Jeffrey Epstein. Cites precedent cases establishing broad litigation privilege for statements made during judicial pr The fili
Legal brief argues Epstein's witness tampering justifies summary judgment against him
The passage provides a lawyer's argument that Jeffrey Epstein's alleged witness intimidation supports a summary‑judgment motion. It mentions Epstein and a party named Edwards, but offers no concrete f Claims Epstein engaged in witness intimidation and tampering. Argument that such conduct creates adverse inferences under the Fifth Amendment. Cites case law (Jost v. Ahmad) to support admissibility
Transcript excerpt references a woman who walked a witness upstairs in Epstein's house
The passage hints at a possible connection between a witness and Jeffrey Epstein's residence, suggesting a line of inquiry about conversations that could reveal further contacts or misconduct. However Witness was questioned about a conversation with a woman who escorted them upstairs in Epstein's hou The line of questioning implies potential undisclosed interactions linked to Epstein. Objections w
Lisa New coordinates private recording session with Jeffrey Epstein, mentions John McCain, Tony Kushner, Al Gore as recent signatories
The email provides a concrete lead – a scheduled meeting on the 23rd in Cambridge involving a Harvard professor and Jeffrey Epstein, with reference to high‑profile political figures (McCain, Gore, Kus Lisa New proposes a private taping session with Epstein on the 23rd, offering multiple locations inc She notes that John McCain, Tony Kushner, and Al Gore have “signed on” in the last two days, imply
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.