Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-30732House OversightOther

Trump delivers rambling CPAC speech with vague claims about fake news

The passage is a narrative of a political speech with no concrete allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads. It offers no new evidence of misconduct or financial flows involving powerful a Describes Trump’s fifth CPAC address and his ad‑lib style. Mentions Trump’s repeated attacks on “fake news” and the First Amendment. Provides no specific claims, dates, or individuals beyond Trump hi

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #019986
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a narrative of a political speech with no concrete allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads. It offers no new evidence of misconduct or financial flows involving powerful a Describes Trump’s fifth CPAC address and his ad‑lib style. Mentions Trump’s repeated attacks on “fake news” and the First Amendment. Provides no specific claims, dates, or individuals beyond Trump hi

Tags

politicsspeechmedia-criticismhouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
mouthing “Thank you,” crimson tie dipping over his belt. This would be Trump’s fifth CPAC address. As much as Steve Bannon liked to see himself as the author of Donald Trump, he also seemed to find it proof of some added legitimacy—and somehow amazing in itself—that since 2011 Trump had basically come to CPAC with the same message. He wasn’t a cipher, he was a messenger. The country was a “mess”—a word that had stood the Trump test of time. Its leaders were weak. Its greatness had been lost. The only thing different was that in 2011 he was still reading his speeches with only occasional ad-libs, and now he ad-libbed everything. “My first major speech was at CPAC,” the president began. “Probably five or six years ago. My first major political speech. You were there. I loved it. I loved the people. I loved the commotion. They did these polls where I went through the roof. I wasn’t even running, right? But it gave me an idea! And I got a little bit concerned when I saw what was happening in the country so I said let’s go to it. It was very exciting. I walked the stage at CPAC-. I had very little notes and even less preparation.” (In fact, he read his 2011 speech from a sheet of paper.) “So when you have practically no notes and no preparation and then you leave and everybody was thrilled. I said, I think I like this business.” This first preamble gave way to the next preamble. “T want you all to know that we are fighting the fake news. It’s phony. Fake. A few days ago I called the fake news the enemy of the people. Because they have no sources. They just make ’em up when there are none. I saw one story recently where they said nine people have confirmed. There are no nine people. I don’t believe there was one or two people. Nine people. And I said, Give me a break. I know the people. I know who they talk to. There were no nine people. But they say nine people... .” A few minutes into the forty-eight-minute speech and it was already off the rails, riff sustained by repetition. “Maybe they’re just bad at polling. Or maybe they’re not legit. It’s one or the other. They’re very smart. They’re very cunning. And they’re very dishonest... . Just to conclude”—although he would go on for thirty-seven minutes more—“‘it’s a very sensitive topic and they get upset when we expose their false stories. They say we can’t criticize their dishonest coverage because of the First Amendment. You know they always bring up’—he went into a falsetto voice—‘“the First Amendment. Now I love the First Amendment. Nobody loves it better than me. Nobody.” Each member of the Trump traveling retinue was now maintaining a careful poker face. When they did break it, it was as though on a delay, given permission by the crowd’s cheering or laughter. Otherwise, they seemed not to know whether the president had in fact gotten away with his peculiar rambles. “By the way, you folks in here, the place is packed, there are lines that go back six blocks”—there were no lines outside the crowded lobby—‘I tell you that because you

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Steve Bannon <I

5p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02518013

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01615550

7p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01656066

0p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Trump meets with top health‑care executives at Mar‑a‑Lago amid ACA repeal push

The passage lists specific senior executives from major medical institutions and two billionaire CEOs meeting the president‑elect, suggesting possible influence on health‑care policy. It provides name Meeting took place on Dec. 28, 2016 at Mar‑a‑Lago, Palm Beach. Attendees included CEOs of Mayo Clinic, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Partners HealthCare, Cleveland Clini No donors to Trump’s campaign among

4p
House OversightUnknown

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests The conversation contains multiple actionable clues – a $100k invoice, references to a ‘cast’ for filming, mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, Michael Wolff, and Chinese market manipulation – that suggest a coordinated media or influence operation involving powerful political actors and foreign financial interests. While the specifics are vague, the repeated references to payments, legal arrangements, and government sensitivity provide concrete follow‑up leads (e.g., trace the $100k invoice, identify the production crew, locate the ‘letter to Burke’, and verify the alleged Chinese market influence). The content is moderately controversial and ties to high‑profile individuals, warranting further investigation. Key insights: Reference to sending an invoice for $100k to Darren – potential payment for services.; Discussion of assembling a ‘cast’ and filming on an island, with government interest in controlling press.; Mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, and Bannon in a context suggesting exploitation or coordinated messaging.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.