Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-30999House OversightOther

Personal narrative about feminist backlash and historical views on PMS

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #018681
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a personal anecdote with no concrete allegations, names, transactions, or links to high‑profile officials or institutions. It offers no actionable investigative leads and discusses only Describes historical dismissal of PMS by male doctors. Mentions personal experience of online feminist harassment. References mother’s support and critique of the author's work.

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

womens-healthfeminismonline-harassmentgenderhouse-oversight
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
they wouldn't work under a woman. (Some returned later, rather sheepishly.) Other favorites have to do with menstruation. It turns out that back in the day, doctors — who were of course always male -- simply refused to accept the existence of PMS. Apparently, it was accepted among doctors that a woman who felt cramps while menstruating was "making it up." (Female nurses who attempted to describe the actual feeling were ignored.) It was understood that a woman who felt unusually emotional or even in physical pain while menstruating was just being moody and hysterical. (You know how women are!) As more women became doctors and feminism gained traction and science advanced with a broader perspective and scientists discovered the actual physical causes of cramps, PMS became recognized as a real thing. Cramps were no longer "typical female hysteria.” Which, of course, makes it all the more ironic that PMS is now often used as an excuse to discount women as hysterical. It makes me laugh, in my cynical way. It's kind of astonishing that a woman like my mother would disclaim a strong connection with feminism. And yet she does. KOK ok This year I had my first Full-On Internet Feminist Scandal, during which I received hate mail and hate comments from other feminists. (I name the event in capital letters because email from other feminists, some of whom I don't even know, has told me that if you stick with Internet Feminism long enough, it's basically inevitable that you obtain one of these.) The worst of it fell on a holiday when I was visiting my mother. Mom was helping out at church, and wanted me to attend the sermon. I sobbed for hours before leaving home; I managed to make it to church, but I was such a wreck when I got there that she put me in a back room so I could be alone to cry. To be clear, I definitely think that I've screwed up on some social justice issues in the past, and I'm sure that I will in the future. I am doing my best to keep myself honest and work on the areas where I've been called out. That's a crucial part of social justice work, and it's one I try to take seriously. But I have to tell you, the piece I wrote that drew the biggest backlash was one that my mother loved. (In the interests of accountability, I'll say that I do think a lot of the critiques are valid and important, like this one for example -- and, for those in the audience who are familiar with feminist call-out culture, I recommend a couple insightful comments from a brilliant Feministe commenter named saurus.) When I wrote the initial draft, I felt so uncertain that I asked Mom to review it, and she said: "I think this is one of the best things you've ever written." Yet one key factor in many of these critiques is that I failed to make enough space for rape survivors. I plan to write differently about the topic in the future, but there's real irony in the fact that the most important rape survivor in my life believes that one of my best pieces is the same one that got me hate mail for failing rape survivors. (Of course, I also received incredibly personal comments about my sex life. The Feminist Sex Wars ain't over yet.) Mom and I discussed it later, of course. She read some of the commentary online, and she came back shaking her head. "The things some feminists are saying about you really

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bill Siegel email chain discussing 'The Control Factor' and anti‑Islamic conspiracy narrative

The passage is an internal email and interview transcript promoting a conspiratorial worldview about 'Islamic Enemy' and 'Civilization Jihad.' It mentions Jeffrey Epstein as a sender but provides no c Email originates from Jeffrey Epstein's address, but only contains a casual invitation and a link to Bill Siegel outlines a theory called the 'Control Factor' that frames Islam as a coordinated threa

20p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01355803

IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE AGENT(S): .When you accept the authority granted under this Authorization/Power of Attorney, a special legal relationship is created between you and the Principal. This relationship imposes on you legal responsibilities that continue until you resign or the Authorization/Power of Attorney is terminated or revoked. You must: 1. act according to any instructions from the Principal, or, where there are no instructions, in the Principal's best interest; 2. avoid c

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN RE:

IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Non-Prosecution Agreement IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein with one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure expressed in this Agreement; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation of Epstein's background and offenses including; knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to commit an offense against the United States, in violation of Titl

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Attachment A

Attachment A CERTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED PRESENCE BY REQUESTING LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY TO: Unit Chief Parole and Law Enforcement Programs Unit Homeland Security Investigations U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement FROM: FBI, New York Field Office RE: Request for Continued Presence for: SAC , of the FBI New York Field Office concur in this request and certify, in accordance with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)'s procedures for Continued Presence, that: 1. The justification and information concerning the request for Continued Presence are accurate and complete. 2. Documentation is attached certifying that the alien is a victim of a severe form of trafficking and may be a potential witness to that trafficking. 3. Name checks have been completed in the principle law enforcement databases on the person named in the request (National Crime Information Center and any other databases available) and, as appropriate, information from foreign law enforcement age

22p
OtherUnknown

" aNIMIIM>

From: " aNIMIIM> To: a' alMIIM>, 11 Subject: RE: SDNY Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 5, 2019 issued to Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 13:55:48 +0000 I'm good with that. <MIMI.> Ori inal Messa e From: Sent: Thursday. August 1.2019 7:24 PM To: Subject: FW: SDNY Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 5, 2019 issued to I'd suggest a call for late Monday afternoon, if that works. Original Message From: Bloom, Suzanne Jaffe aa Sent: Thursday. August 1.2019 7:20 PM To: Cc: Hud ens, Johanna Rae Subject: Re: SDNY Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 5, 2019 issued to Hi all. Thanks again for your time yesterday. Just checking in to see when you'd like to continue our conversation. Please let us know what would work best for you. Many thanks, Suzanne Suzanne Jaffe Bloom Partner Winston & Strawn LLP <x-apple-data-detectors://2/1><x-apple-data-detectors://4/1>200 Park Avenue<x-apple-data-detectors://0/1> New York, NY 10166-4193<x-apple-data-detectors://0/1> Bio<http://vvwvv.winston.comien

4p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01357352

From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: 1/21/2014 3: Edward Borlan1 Amanda Kirb Re: Case: 011 Reg E Dislcosure 01180757.pdf; pic26851.gif; pic15919.gie pic23576.gif; pic02726.gif Classification: Public Hi Amanda, my sincere apologies. I just reattached the correct disclosure in there. (See attached file: Reg E Dislcosure 01180757.pdf) Is it ok to you use the authorization time you put in dbforce? Thank you, Ted Borland (Embedded image moved to file: pic26851.gif) Ted Borland Assis

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.