Lawyers Seek to Reopen Federal Case Against Jeffrey Epstein Over Secret Plea Deal
Summary
The passage details an active lawsuit alleging that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by keeping a secret non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. It names specific off Lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell filed a lawsuit on behalf of two Jane Does alleging a secre They argue federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by not informing victims of
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Petition to Reopen Jeffrey Epstein Teen Sex Case Targets Federal Government Over Plea Deal
The passage reveals a legal effort to force a federal judge to reopen the Epstein case, implicating U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra and federal officials for potentially violating the Crime Victims' Attorneys filed a lawsuit on behalf of two Jane Does seeking to overturn Epstein's 2008 plea deal. The suit alleges federal officials violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by not informing victims o
Witness claims to have knowledge of alleged Epstein‑related investigations and asserts no sexual misconduct, referencing Bradley Edwards, Paul Cass...
The passage provides a potential lead that a witness (likely a former associate of Jeffrey Epstein) claims to possess privileged information about investigations by high‑profile private investigators Witness asserts they never had sexual contact with Virginia Roberts or any underage girls. Claims knowledge of what investigators Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell gathered. References a letter from M
Judges to Review Whether Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 Non‑Prosecution Deal Violated Victims’ Rights
The passage identifies a pending judicial review of the 2007 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) between the U.S. Attorney’s Office and Jeffrey Epstein, with attorneys seeking unsealing of plea‑deal corre U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra will decide on the legality of the 2007 NPA. Attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell are demanding the unredacted plea‑deal correspondence be rel The case hinges on
Court denies addition of new Jane Does in lawsuit seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement
The passage reveals a procedural fight over standing to challenge Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, indicating ongoing litigation that could expose details of the deal. While it does not provide ne Petitioners are seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein’s non‑prosecution agreement. Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 request to join the suit, claiming similar CVRA rights violations. The court rejects their
Petitioners claim U.S. government failed to consult victims before non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein
The filing alleges that the federal government negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein without informing the victims, suggesting possible misconduct by high‑level officials. It pro Petitioners invoke the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771). Allegation that the U.S. government negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstei Claim that victims were not c
Debate Over Whether Jeffrey Epstein’s Federal Non‑Prosecution Deal Violated Victims’ Rights
The passage reveals that U.S. attorneys concealed a federal non‑prosecution agreement from alleged victims and possibly violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, suggesting a potential prosecutorial mis Federal non‑prosecution agreement with Epstein kept secret from victims in 2008. U.S. attorneys sent letters to victims describing an ongoing federal investigation despite the agree Assistant U.S. At
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.