Skip to content
Case File
d-31616House OversightOther

Speculative email suggesting Trump may hire attorney Alan Dershowitz

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #032767
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The passage offers a vague, unsubstantiated hint that former President Trump might hire Alan Dershowitz. It lacks concrete details such as dates, transactions, or corroborating evidence, making it a l Sender references "trump will probably hire dershowitz" without supporting evidence. Email marked as confidential/attorney‑client privileged, suggesting possible legal context. Includes a link to a J

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

speculationlegal-counsellegal-counsel-speculationpotential-conflict-of-interestalan-dershowitztrumphouse-oversight
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Speculative email suggesting Trump may hire attorney Alan Dershowitz

The passage offers a vague, unsubstantiated hint that former President Trump might consider hiring Alan Dershowitz. It lacks concrete details such as dates, transactions, or corroborating evidence, ma Email from an unnamed sender to a private address mentions "trump likely to hire dershowitz". The message is marked as high importance but contains no supporting evidence. Both parties claim confiden

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Speculative email hinting Trump may hire attorney Alan Dershowitz

The passage contains a vague, unsubstantiated suggestion that former President Trump might hire Alan Dershowitz. It lacks concrete details, dates, transactions, or evidence, offering minimal investiga Email from an unnamed sender to journalist Michael Wolff. Mentions possible hiring of Alan Dershowitz by Trump. Contains standard confidentiality disclaimer.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Speculative note that Trump may hire Alan Dershowitz

The email contains a vague, unsubstantiated suggestion that former President Trump might hire attorney Alan Dershowitz. It lacks concrete details, dates, or evidence, offering minimal investigative va Sender Jeffrey E. predicts Trump will consider hiring Dershowitz. No supporting documentation, timeline, or context provided. Email includes standard confidentiality disclaimer, but no substantive co

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Speculative email suggesting Trump may hire Alan Dershowitz for a role

The passage contains a casual, unverified speculation that President Trump might hire Alan Dershowitz, referencing a media appearance. It offers no concrete details, dates, transactions, or actionable Email from Richard Kahn to a private individual mentions Dershowitz interviewing for a job on Fox Ne The sender speculates that Trump will probably hire Dershowitz. No specific position, timeline, or

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jane Doe #3’s affidavit falsely claims former President Bill Clinton was on Jeffrey Epstein’s island, citing it to implicate Professor Alan Dershowitz

The passage links a former U.S. President and a high‑profile attorney to the Epstein island narrative, suggesting possible misconduct and providing a specific false claim that could be investigated fo Jane Doe #3 alleges Bill Clinton was present on Epstein’s private island during her own presence. The claim is presented in an affidavit filed in case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM. The allegation is used to bol

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court filing argues that Judge Marra's order does not bar unredacted documents on alleged sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in Epstein-related CVRA case

The passage identifies a legal dispute over the confidentiality of documents that could contain allegations linking a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) to sexual abuse of a known victim (Virgini Judge Marra allowed Giuffre to testify but initially struck certain allegations as confidential. The order permits re‑filing of documents with omitted portions, suggesting unredacted material may b D

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.