Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-31633House OversightOther

Speculative essay on oxytocin, human aggression, and historical analogies

The passage contains no concrete names, dates, transactions, or verifiable allegations linking any high‑profile individuals or institutions to wrongdoing. It is a philosophical/biological commentary t Oxytocin is described as enhancing in‑group favoritism and out‑group hostility. The text draws parallels between animal cooperation and human social structures. Broad historical examples are cited (E

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #012792
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains no concrete names, dates, transactions, or verifiable allegations linking any high‑profile individuals or institutions to wrongdoing. It is a philosophical/biological commentary t Oxytocin is described as enhancing in‑group favoritism and out‑group hostility. The text draws parallels between animal cooperation and human social structures. Broad historical examples are cited (E

Tags

aggressionoxytocinsocial-psychologyhistorical-analogyhouse-oversighthuman-behavior

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
control group, those who sniffed oxytocin perceived in-group members as more likeable, more human, more richly endowed with social emotions such as embarrassment, contempt, humiliation and admiration, and more worthy of saving in an emergency. Oxytocin increases our sense of camaraderie toward those within the inner sanctum, which can result in greater animosity toward those outside. Oxytocin may therefore facilitate our ability to take out the competition even if this means killing another human being. Oxytocin is two-faced, cuddling with its left profile and harming with its right. This is a small sampling of the ways in which our promiscuous brain enables new forms of harm, including killing other adults. We didn’t invent lethal aggression. We share this capacity with a small group of animals that also kill other adults. But whereas these other species typically restrict their lethal attacks to situations in which one group greatly outnumbers another, typically targeting adults from a neighboring group, we evolved far beyond this monogamous approach. We adopted the cost-benefit analysis that drives killing in other animals and applied it to killing in a virtually limitless space of homicidal opportunities. We kill when we outnumber our opponents or are outnumbered by them, attacking individuals within and outside our core group. We kill spouses, ex-lovers, stepchildren, those who believe in God and those who don’t, the wealthy and the poor, kin and non-kin, and even ourselves if the cause is good enough. Virtually anything goes. Our promiscuous brains opened a Pandora’s box of harmful means, including the capacity to address a multitude of injustices. This is a capacity that is inherently good, but incidentally bad. It is a capacity that evolved in response to growing pressures to balance inequities and take care of those who attempt to cheat society. It is a capacity that enabled us to engage in punishment in a broad range of contexts, righting wrongs and opening a new path to feeling good about harming others. Incidental justice Cooperation is ubiquitous in the animal kingdom, occurring in a wide range of situations. Humans are no exception. Like ants, humans also bring resources to their queen — think England. Like scrub jays, humans work with extended family members to rear the next generation of offspring — think Mormons. Like dolphins, human males form super-coalitions to gain access to females — think the Yanomami Indians of South America, where men raid neighboring villages to take their women. And like chimpanzees, humans cooperate to monitor their borders, often capturing and killing intruders — think Palestine and Israel. But human cooperation is distinctive in two ways: we frequently cooperate with Hauser Chapter 1. Nature’s secrets 46

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.