Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-31648House OversightOther

Proposed Amendments to Federal Rules to Expand Victims' Rights Under the CVRA

The passage outlines legislative proposals to broaden victims' procedural rights and cites senators who sponsored the CVRA. It contains no specific allegations of wrongdoing, financial flows, or misco Suggests adding Rule 2 language to require fairness to victims in criminal proceedings. Proposes a new Rule 10.1 to guarantee victims notice of proceedings. References Senator Jon Kyl, Senators Diann

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017728
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage outlines legislative proposals to broaden victims' procedural rights and cites senators who sponsored the CVRA. It contains no specific allegations of wrongdoing, financial flows, or misco Suggests adding Rule 2 language to require fairness to victims in criminal proceedings. Proposes a new Rule 10.1 to guarantee victims notice of proceedings. References Senator Jon Kyl, Senators Diann

Tags

legislative-proposalspolicy-proposalfederal-rulescriminal-procedurelegal-reformhouse-oversightcvravictims-rights

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 14 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *857 [*858] Rule 1 also appears to be the best place to include the CVRA's language about a "representative" of a victim. This language, too, draws from the restitution statutes. !?7 Rule 2 - Fairness to Victims in Construction The Proposal: Rule 2 should be amended to require fairness to victims in construing the rules as follows: These rules are to be interpreted to provide for the just determination of every criminal proceeding, to secure simplicity in procedure and fairness in administration to the government, defendants, and victims, and to eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay. The Rationale: The CVRA broadly mandates that victims have the right to "be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy." !?8 This creates a substantive right to fairness, similar to that found in various state victims' rights amendments - including the [*859] amendment found in Senator Kyl's home state of Arizona. !°? This broad reading was explained by Senator Kyl, who, along with Senators Feinstein and Hatch, was the primary legislative sponsor of the CVRA: "The broad rights articulated in this section are meant to be rights themselves and are not intended to just be aspirational. One of these rights is the right to be treated with fairness. Of course, fairness includes the notion of due process." 13° In light of victims’ new substantive right to fairness, Rule 2 should be amended to make clear that all of the rules must be construed to be fair to victims no less than to the government and defendants. (New) Rule 10.1 - Notice of Proceedings for Victims The Proposal: A new Rule 10.1 should be added to guarantee victims their right to notice of proceedings as follows: Rule 10.1 Notice to Victims. crime deserve to have their rights protected, whether or not they are the victim of the count charged." See 150 Cong. Rec. $10,910-01 (daily ed. Oct. 9, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl). At least one court has suggested that, as a matter of discretion, it is desirable to notify even victims of uncharged conduct under the CVRA. See United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319, 327 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (concluding that, absent reason to think otherwise, any person who the government asserts has been harmed by a crime or who self-identifies as such qualifies as a "victim"); cf. In re WR. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., 409 F.3d 555, 561 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding that the CVRA does not grant victims any rights against individuals not convicted of a crime, but the government can attempt to obtain voluntary restitution from such persons). 27 See, e.g., 18 U.S.C. 3663A(a) (same definition of victim "representative"). 128 18 U.S.C.A. 3771(a)(8) (West 2004 & Supp. 2005). 29 See, e.g., Ariz. Const. art. II, 2(A)(1) (victim's right "to be treated with fairness, respect, and dignity"); see also Alaska Const. art. I, 24 (victim's right "to be treated with dignity, respect, and fairness during all phases of the criminal and juvenile justice process"); Idaho Const. art. I, 22 (victim's right "to be treated with fairness, respect, dignity and privacy throughout the criminal justice process"); Ill. Const. art. I, 8.1 (victims "to be treated with fairness and respect for their dignity"); Mich. Const. art. I, 24 (victims "to be treated with fairness and respect for their dignity and privacy throughout the criminal justice process"); N.J. Const. art. I, P 22 (victim's right to "be treated with fairness, compassion and respect by the criminal justice system"); N.M. Const. art. II, 24 (the "right to be treated with fairness and respect for the victim's dignity and privacy throughout the criminal justice process"); Ohio Const. art. I, 10a (victims "shall be accorded fairness, dignity, and respect in the criminal justice process"); Tex. Const. art. I, 30(a)(1) ("right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy throughout the criminal justice process"); Utah Const. art. I, 28(1)(a) (victim's right to be "treated with fairness, respect, and dignity"); Wis. Const. art. I, 9m (victim's right to be treated with "fairness, dignity and respect for their privacy"). See generally Cassell, supra note 15, at 1387-88 (discussing victims' right to fairness in Utah). 130 150 Cong. Rec. 4269 (daily ed. Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl). DAVID SCHOEN

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein

From: To: Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:09:33 +0000 Attachments: (USANYS)" < Sorry, I mean to send this to you a while ago. More of the same from him. From: Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 2:04 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein It is literally unimaginable. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2019 22:38 To: Subject: Re: Schoen and Epstein Can you imagine moving forward with that case with David Schoen as the "quarterback" of the defense team? Yikes. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2019, at 9:06 PM, ) < > wrote: I got a hit on this as an end-of-year thing from my google alert on Epstein - I had not realized that he did a huge, crazy, absurdly self-aggrandizing interview on this!! https://atlantajewishtimes.timesofisrael.comijeffrey-epstein-consulted-atlanta-attomey-days-before-death/ I don't believe a word of his. Just unreal. From: Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 20:00 To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen an

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00026451

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02541489

4p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01763941

9p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Proposal to Require Victim Input on Nolo Contendere Pleas Cited in CVRA Subcommittee Discussion

The passage outlines a procedural reform suggestion for federal criminal sentencing and notes an apparent oversight by the Advisory Committee. While it mentions Senator Feinstein, it does not provide Advocates amending Rule 11(a)(3) to require courts to consider victims' views before accepting a nol Senator Dianne Feinstein is quoted supporting broader victim rights under the Crime Victims' Right

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02456600

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.