Skip to content
Case File
d-32041House OversightOther

Email discussing human cognitive development theories, no apparent political or financial leads

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #025957
Pages
1
Persons
1

Summary

The passage is a personal email about scientific hypotheses on human cognition with no mention of influential actors, transactions, or misconduct. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Email authored by Joscha Bach to Jeffrey on July 10, 2016 References Noam Chomsky's modular brain theory Proposes genetic developmental switches as basis for human cognitive layers

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

email-correspondencecognitive-sciencehouse-oversightdevelopmental-psychology
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Personal email discussing cognitive development theories

The passage is a private correspondence about scientific hypotheses on human cognition with no mention of influential actors, financial flows, legal matters, or controversial actions. It offers no act Email exchange between Joscha Bach and Jeffrey. References to Noam Chomsky's ideas on modular cognition. Speculative discussion of genetic developmental switches and child development differences.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Chomsky–Krauss email discussing secular dogma and academic attitudes

The passage contains only a personal email exchange with philosophical commentary and no concrete allegations, transactions, or actionable leads involving powerful actors. It mentions no specific misc Email exchange between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss dated September 2015. Discussion of secular dogma, American exceptionalism, and academic discourse. Reference to a New Yorker article about sci

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email chain discussing religion, fanaticism, and academic opinions

The passage contains a casual email exchange among academics with no concrete allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful officials. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Emails involve Lawrence Krauss, a physicist, and Noam Chomsky, a linguist. Discussion centers on religious and secular fanaticism, not specific misconduct. No mention of financial transactions, government ag

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email exchange between Noam Chomsky and a private individual discussing scientific models

The passage contains a casual email conversation about behavioral science theories and currency, with no concrete allegations, financial flows, or involvement of high‑ranking officials. It offers no a Discussion of discredited behavioral science model and Big Data. Mention of 'one currency' warnings, but no specifics. No references to government agencies, officials, or financial transactions.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email exchange on visual grammar theory between Noam Chomsky and a private individual

The passage contains a casual academic discussion about vision and language with no mention of influential actors, financial flows, or misconduct. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Conversation dated December 24, 2015 Involves Noam Chomsky (public intellectual) and a private email address Discusses theoretical concepts of visual and language grammar

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email exchange between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss discussing religion and secular dogma

The passage contains a casual philosophical discussion with no concrete allegations, names of powerful actors beyond public intellectuals, no financial or legal details, and offers no actionable inves Conversation between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss dated September 2015 Mentions criticism of secular nationalism and US foreign policy rhetoric References a New Yorker article about scientists an

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.