Social media chatter on Brexit referendum dated 23 Jun 2016
Summary
The passage is a collection of unrelated Twitter‑style posts about the EU referendum. It contains no concrete allegations, financial flows, or links to high‑ranking officials. The content is largely n Multiple users mention the Brexit vote on 23 June 2016. References to Donald Trump visiting France on the same date, but no connection to the referendum. Various sentiment tags (positive, negative, n
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Social media chatter around Brexit referendum (June 23, 2016) with scattered mentions of political figures
The document is a collection of unrelated Twitter‑style posts about the EU referendum. It contains no concrete evidence, transactions, or actionable leads linking powerful actors to wrongdoing. The on Numerous posts reference the Brexit vote on 23 June 2016. A single tweet claims Karl Rove commented on the vote, but provides no context. Mentions of Donald Trump and Marine Le Pen appear alongside g
Social media chatter on Brexit from June 23, 2016 – no substantive investigative leads
The document is a collection of unrelated tweets and retweets about the Brexit referendum, containing no concrete names, transactions, dates beyond the public referendum, or allegations linking powerf All entries are dated June 23, 2016, the day of the Brexit vote. Mentions of David Cameron, Donald Trump, and EU officials are limited to generic political statement No specific financial flows, lega
Social media chatter about Brexit referendum on June 23, 2016
The document consists of assorted tweets and short posts referencing the Brexit vote, with no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving high‑level officials. It offers no actionab Multiple users posted about the June 23, 2016 Brexit referendum. Mentions of political figures (Boris Johnson, Donald Trump) are superficial and lack substantive cla No specific transactions, dates,
Tweet Sentiment Analysis of 2016 US Presidential Debates
The passage only provides aggregated sentiment percentages and generic winning chance estimates for the candidates, without any specific actors, transactions, or misconduct. It offers no actionable in 22.89% positive sentiment for Donald Trump vs 34.18% for Hillary Clinton 62.73% negative sentiment for Trump vs 49.80% for Clinton Reported winning chance estimates (Clinton 59%, Trump 41%)
Sentiment analysis of 3.1M tweets on 2016 US election candidates
The passage provides basic social media sentiment percentages and projected winning chances, but contains no actionable leads, names of influential actors beyond publicly known candidates, nor any nov Processed 3.1 million tweets related to the 2016 election debate period Donald Trump sentiment: 11.8% positive, 15.66% neutral, 72.54% negative Hillary Clinton sentiment: 40.7% positive, 19.09% neutr
Social Media Sentiment Snapshot of 2024 US Election Candidates
The passage only provides aggregated tweet sentiment percentages and projected winning chances for candidates, without any specific names, transactions, dates, or actionable leads linking powerful act Aggregated sentiment for Donald Trump: 19.29% positive, 35.03% neutral, 45.68% negative. Aggregated sentiment for Hillary Clinton: 20.44% positive, 20.79% neutral, 58.77% negative. Overall projected
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.