Defense attorney recounts emotional encounter with victim's mother in Maryland murder appealNetanyahu family lawyer contacts author over personal relationship to Yoni's partner
Case File
d-32143House OversightFinancial RecordInternal memo alleging mismanagement, unpaid cash flows and $30 M ‘Carlyn’ settlement within a House oversight office
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #023218
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
The passage hints at possible financial irregularities (cash flows, stock accounts, a $30 million ‘Carlyn’ mess) and internal obstruction by a staffer named Eileen, but provides no concrete names of e Alleged failure to report cash flows, stock accounts and structures to a senior official. Reference to a JPMorgan account that is “still not in use”. Mention of a $30 million settlement or loss terme
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionTags
financial-flowstaff-misconductfinancial-irregularitiesunpaid-serviceslegal-exposurehouse-oversightinternal-obstructioninternal-oversight
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #023218
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
new person,- is. coordination with Suydam Kathy Gregory, I would suggest limiting to one person.
The increasing public profile needs to be taken into consideration.
TODAY
With your acquiesence , Eileen did not report to Delson ( he acting as a conduit directly to me) , she
continued to provide bad info to both you ( cash flows , stock accts, structures. sales Etc) and me.
and each time with my many annoying calls to you made immediately afterwards that she was g....-y !!
No one was hired to run YOUR office until two months ago , no one was even interviewed and even
now , Brad, a very nice man, 1s not even full time,(crazy ) Hours upon hours of time need to be spent
training him . and his new staff. Eileen followed your instructions. not mine. in fact she continued to
ignore mine saying " but Leon said "or" its on Leon's desk etc", You would become frustrated
when 1 pointed out each instance. of her obfuscation. originally you were given the clear choice, but
to save money ,you chose not to hire my team . I was hired to do the architecture, you kept your own
team. with Eileen at the head. instructions were given by me, , detailed but ignored by her. ( except in
the instances where I inserted myself and personally had to do the weeks of grunt work
),ex. jpm morgan acct still not in use? That being said, If you do the cold calculation ,starting from
where you were, to where you are currently . you have made a hell ofa deal. -- negotiating down
my original amount requested , calling upon our friendship and suggesting that the Carlyn mess was
partially my fault. (though in that specific example , I had never been asked to do more than merely
provide you the name of the most highly recognized atty in the field, not consulted,nor even asked
again for my guidance along the way. ).I accepted the discount as your friend. ( by the way
suggesting now, that your Tom is now that last word on tax characterization, frankly is a bit much,-).
however - that is all in the past.
In order to move forward
I would ask that you realize that very unlike yours, My business is only comprised of my personal
attention and my personal time . Time that I was forced to grossly overspend on your various issues
last year. . As you are my very close friend I will not have you participate in a bidding process that I
have decided 1 will have this year for my time . (hopefully a more fair way to allocate ) I would also
ask that you keep in mind that though our deal expired months ago. (also keeping in mind , that your
understanding of the final payment terms neither reflected the emails or my memory, we finished it up
your way. ) I have answered every call Brad , joslin, Ada or you, have made . reviewed docs over and
over/ until once again, I was forced to insert myself strongly as I thought it dangerous not to. I made
serious dollar and time concessions last year.very serious I am wiling to continue to accommodate
some of your concerns , but I am, under no circumstances , none, willing to spend my time for free.
its not fair. After cleaning up Carlyn's mess , which was a few weeks and 30 million dollars . We
were both highly aware of the dire circumstances in which you found yourself last year, and in fact due
predominately to its seriousness. and those very circumstances I took extra care in our negotiations .
(you had claimed I had you over a barrel , ( a horrible position to be in with my very close friend.),
unfortunately I fear that if you are not cautious ,in the near future, another barrel will appear of your
own design )
I heard you when you said you believed 1 had already been paid for the work that is now required. The
art partnership has fully answered all your concerns and discharged all my obligations and more so.
. (FYI Carlyns art partnership that you referenced is similar in only its title.) You will also recall
that you required that my payments be at the end of my work not at the beginning as everyone else's .(
my work was never to include hours upon hours of training your staff). I eventually agreed, this of
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.