Critique of Advisory Committee Proposal Limiting Crime Victims' Rights to Address Disclosure and Face‑to‑Face Meetings
Summary
The passage raises procedural due‑process concerns about a proposed rule change affecting crime‑victim privacy, but it does not name any high‑profile officials, agencies, or financial transactions. It Victims may be forced to disclose home address to defendants under the Advisory Committee's draft ru Proposed face‑to‑face meetings between victims and defendants could violate federal jurisdiction l
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Attorney for Epstein victims: 'I've never seen a stranger case' – non‑prosecution deal raises questions
The passage reveals a sealed federal non‑prosecution agreement that granted immunity to Jeffrey Epstein and several co‑defendants in exchange for a short state jail term. While the existence of the de Federal non‑prosecution agreement sealed for Epstein and four co‑defendants. Immunity granted despite potential life‑sentence offenses. Victims were not consulted on the deal.
Court Discusses Due Process and Minimum Contacts in Products Liability Cases Involving Alleged Al Qaeda Links
The passage primarily outlines legal standards for personal jurisdiction and due process, offering no concrete names, transactions, dates, or actionable leads. The only hint of a controversial connect Legal analysis of minimum contacts and reasonableness under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Reference to defendants' alleged, but unspecified, ties to al Qaeda. Discussion of New York long‑arm s
Proposed Rule Change to Limit Victim Address Disclosure in Federal Plea and Alibi Cases
The document outlines a policy proposal to amend disclosure rules for victim information in criminal proceedings. While it identifies a potential procedural shift, it lacks specific actors, transactio Suggests limiting prosecutors' duty to disclose victim addresses/phone numbers to defendants in alib Proposes that only victim objections be reported to the court during plea negotiations. Cites exis
Proposed Amendments to Federal Sentencing Rules Expanding Victim Access to Presentence Reports
The passage outlines scholarly proposals to modify criminal procedure rules, focusing on victim notification and input. While it identifies specific rule changes and cites legal authorities, it does n Suggests victims should receive presentence reports before sentencing. Calls for a 35‑day notice period to defendants, counsel, and government attorneys. Proposes victim objection rights and potentia
Attorney discusses appellate arguments in Boston doctors‑nurse rape case
The passage recounts a specific criminal case involving medical professionals and a nurse, but it contains no new evidence, financial transactions, or links to high‑level officials or institutions. It Case involved three doctors and a nurse accused of non‑consensual sex at a vacation home. Defendants were convicted and sentenced to six months despite claims of consent. Appellate court declined to
Email chain forwarding a Reuters lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein (April 2016)
The passage merely confirms that a Reuters‑related lawsuit was being circulated among lawyers in April 2016. It provides no new factual details, names of defendants beyond Epstein, transaction data, o Lawyers Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger were discussing a Reuters lawsuit against Je The email chain includes a forwarded message from David Ingram at Reuters attaching the suit. Date
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.