Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-32486House OversightDeposition

Incoherent Deposition Transcript with Casual Text Message Reference

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #012410
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The excerpt contains fragmented dialogue from a deposition and a personal text message with no clear connection to any influential actors, financial transactions, or misconduct. It lacks specific name Deposition includes vague references to a serious testimony but no substantive content. A casual text message mentions MySpace and personal affection, unrelated to any official matter. No high‑profil

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

personal-communicationmyspacetranscriptdepositionhouse-oversight
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
~0929104. TXT 14 MR. LEOPOLD: But | would suggest that you 15 take deep breaths. 16 MR. TEIN: Suggest whatever you want. Go 17 take a break. 18 (Thereupon, a recess was taken.) 19 BY MR. TEIN: 20 Q. | you agree that giving testimony 21 today at your deposition is something very serious, don't 22 you? 23 A. Yes. 24 25 18 1 Q. Let me show you Exhibit 31-001. Can you 2 read that out loud, please? 3 A. Okay. What do you want? 4 Q Will you read that out loud, please. 5 A. Oh. 6 Q Thank you. 7 A & @: Like after so long wow 10 im sorry... well yah well we wil! definitely havta make 11 plans for sure..because i miss u tons times a million and 12 no no no i love you...0 p.s. ji love ur default pic 13° niggaa. Muah xo. 14 Q. Did you send that message last week to a 15 friend of yours on MySpace? 16 A. 1 wouldn't know. There's no dates and I've 17 deleted that MySpace, so -- Page 15

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

House Oversight hearing excerpt reveals possible undisclosed cell phone evidence and questions about financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein

The passage hints that a cell phone, potentially containing incriminating data, was handed to Michelle Pagan and not returned, and raises the question of how much money a witness hopes to receive from Witness gave a cell phone to Michelle Pagan several years ago and has not recovered it. The cell phone could contain communications relevant to ongoing investigations. The line of questioning probes

1p
House OversightPolice ReportNov 11, 2025

Courtroom exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold over parental police report

The passage provides a brief, disjointed transcript with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations linking influential actors. It lacks actionable details and appears to be ro Mr. Tein questions Mr. Leopold about the parents who filed a police report. The dialogue suggests a dispute over the relevance and appropriateness of the question. No specific individuals, agencies,

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Transcript excerpt from House Oversight deposition showing heated exchange over exhibit handling

The passage records a minor procedural dispute in a deposition with no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details. It offers little investigative value beyond confirming normal courtroom Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of misrepresenting the record. Dispute over labeling and copying of exhibits. Witness expresses willingness to disagree professionally.

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition excerpt shows heated exchange among attorneys with no substantive allegations

The passage is a routine courtroom deposition transcript featuring lawyers arguing over procedure. It contains no names of influential actors, no financial or misconduct details, and offers no actiona The excerpt records a dispute between attorneys (Mr. Tein, Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Leopold) about taking No mention of any high‑profile individuals, agencies, or controversial actions. The content is pro

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Testimony on alleged underage relationship involving Palm Beach firefighter Brett

The passage provides a vague courtroom exchange about a possible underage sexual relationship involving a local firefighter. It lacks concrete names beyond the firefighter, no financial or political c Witness questioned about a 22‑year‑old Palm Beach firefighter named Brett dating an underage girl. Questions focus on whether the fire department or police were aware of the relationship. No specific

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Witness unable to identify individuals visiting home during House Oversight hearing

The excerpt provides only vague testimony from a witness who cannot recall names or details of visitors, mentioning only a non‑prominent name (Jeffrey Sloman/Herman). There are no concrete leads, tran Witness repeatedly states lack of knowledge about visitors' identities. Names mentioned (Jeffrey Sloman, Jeffrey Herman) are not linked to known public figures. No specific dates, locations, or finan

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.