Fragmentary House Oversight Transcript with Unidentified Witness References
Summary
The excerpt provides only vague, unnamed references to individuals (e.g., John, Robbie, Brandon) without any clear connection to high‑ranking officials, financial transactions, or misconduct. No actio Witness mentions several people by first name only. No surnames, titles, or affiliations are provided. Context suggests a hearing but the subject matter is unclear.
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionTags
Related Documents (6)
Email chain about preparing a presentation for a visitor referred to as “Mr. Epstein” on May 10‑11, 2015
The passage contains a brief internal email about logistical preparations for a meeting with an unnamed “Mr. Epstein.” It lacks concrete details about any influential actors, financial transactions, o Emails dated May 10, 2015 discuss a scheduled visit by “Mr. Epstein.” The sender, Brandon Thompson, describes work on a visual presentation (balancing whites/darks, rope, Richard Kahn requests photos
Incoherent transcript with vague references to unnamed individuals and a photo
The passage contains fragmented dialogue, no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable details linking any influential actors to wrongdoing. It appears to be garbled or unrelated content, off Mentions of individuals named 'Nick', 'Brandon', 'Steven', and 'John' without context or roles. Reference to a photo and a stepmother, but no clear relevance. Random mentions of 'firemen', 'football'
Witnesses invoke Fifth Amendment despite non‑prosecution agreement, hindering plaintiff's case
The excerpt hints at a possible non‑prosecution agreement involving unnamed witnesses who refuse to testify, which could be a lead for further inquiry. However, it lacks concrete names, dates, or fina Two witnesses refuse to testify, invoking the Fifth Amendment. Witnesses are allegedly named in a non‑prosecution agreement. Ms. Maxwell appears to benefit from their testimony but cannot obtain it.
Sparse House Oversight Hearing Transcript with No Substantive Content
The passage contains only a brief, generic exchange and a procedural note, lacking any names, transactions, dates, or allegations that could be pursued. It offers no actionable leads, controversy, nov Only a brief dialogue between an unnamed witness and Mr. Goldberger. Sworn statement concluded at 4:20 p.m. No substantive allegations or details provided.
Transcript excerpt hints at alleged sexual misconduct and possible prostitution involving unnamed individuals
The passage contains fragmented dialogue suggesting a massage that turned into sexual activity and possible prostitution, but it lacks concrete names, dates, financial details, or connections to high‑ Witness (DOBBS) describes a massage that escalated to sexual acts. Reference to a payment of $300 for services. Mentions of other women possibly being recruited for similar activities.
Incoherent interview transcript with vague references to payments and personal remarks
The passage consists of fragmented dialogue lacking any concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It does not identify any high‑profile individuals or institutions, nor does it sugge Mentions of a payment to an unnamed woman for an unspecified amount. Reference to a chef described as 'old' and 'hot' with no clear relevance. Repeated use of 'MP' indicating interview segments, but
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.