Opinion piece on Fifty Shades of Grey and gender dynamics

I wrote this in early 2012, when everyone and their brother was talking about the amazingly successful fanfiction-turned-BDSM-smut Fifty Shades of Grey trilogy, by E.L. James. (The online version of this post contains a bunch of relevant current links at the end.) It's one of my rare attempts at pegging an article to a recent news item; I had been planning to write this article for months, but Fifty Shades gave me an opportunity to actually do it. My main goal as a sex writer has always been to put forth analysis that's responsive to the conversations I hear a lot, yet independent of the latest craze. For one thing, I almost never care to track what Everyone Is Talking About Right This Minute!!, and I'm irritated to think that I ought to do so. But I've come to reluctantly understand that responding to current news is one of the best ways to get more eyeballs on my work, so I'm trying to do more of that. I've also been encouraged in that direction by employers -- most notably the gender-lens website RoleReboot.org, where I took on the role of Sex + Relationships Section Editor in late 2011. A slightly shorter version of this article was originally published there. te Kk ok Fifty Shades of Grey, Fight Club, and the Complications of Male Dominance Much is being made of the highly successful S&M erotica novel Fifty Shades of Grey. People are blaming feminism for making women into submissives, blaming feminism for preventing women from being submissives, blaming women for having sexual desires at all, and a whole lot of other boring and typical stuff that comes up in any conversation about women and S&M. News flash: it's not the feminist revolution that is "causing" women to have fantasies of submission. S&M fantasies have been around since the beginning of time. (And the 1950s S&M-sensation book, The Story of O, was much better written than Fifty Shades of Grey.) As an S&M writer, I hear a lot of allegations about how "all" (or "almost all") women are sexually submissive and how this must Mean Something. This is echoed in the coverage of Fifty Shades of Grey, in which everyone is demanding to know What It All Means About Women. I've already taken on these questions as they apply to women. But there's another submerged question here -- about men. There's plenty of talk and stereotypes about how men are inherently violent, or more aggressive than women, or "the dominant sex.” As I said in my previous article: I think it's quite questionable whether women are "inherently submissive,” but my conclusion is that I don't care. It doesn't actually matter to me whether women in general are "inherently submissive” (though I really don't think women are), or whether submissive women's preferences are philosophically Deep And Meaningful (though I'm not convinced they are). What matters is: 1. How women (or any other people) can explore sexually submissive preferences consensually, 2. How women (or any other people) can compartmentalize submissive preferences so that their whole lives are safe and fulfilling and happy, and 3. How women (or any other people) can be treated well in arenas that aren't even relevant to their sexuality -- like the workplace. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018550