Epstein Defense Counsel Claims Federal Sex Offender Registration and Charges Were Improperly Pursued
Summary
The passage details internal communications between Epstein’s counsel and the South District of Florida (SDFL) regarding alleged procedural improprieties in federal charges and sex offender registrati Counsel argued that 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) was not applicable because no interstate communication was us Multiple letters (Dec 14, 17, 21, 26 2007) show attempts to persuade the SDFL to drop or modify ch
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Jeffrey Epstein Case Involving Federal Prosecutors and FAUSA Jeffrey Sloman
The passage alleges irregular conduct by the Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office, including inappropriate involvement of a First Assistant U.S. Attorney (Jeffrey Sloman) in both the Epstein case and a separa FAUSA Jeffrey Sloman allegedly participated in the initial phone call with Epstein's defense counsel AUSA Marie Villafana issued document requests for Epstein's 2004‑2005 tax returns and medical reco
Internal memo reveals aggressive defense strategy for Jeffrey Epstein involving high‑profile attorneys and attempts to disqualify prosecutors
The passage details a coordinated defense effort for Epstein that included Alan Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr, and other senior legal figures, and describes attempts to disqualify prosecutors. It suggests Defense team hired Alan Dershowitz, former Dean Kenneth Starr, and other senior lawyers for Epstein. Defense counsel attempted to disqualify at least two prosecutors by investigating their personal l
Letter from U.S. Attorney Kevin Acosta to Kenneth Starr cites concerns over Epstein plea‑deal negotiations and potential collusion by defense counsel
The passage reveals an internal DOJ communication highlighting that prosecutors were aware of possible tactics to undermine the 2007 non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. It names specific o Acosta’s December 2007 letter to Kenneth Starr flags Epstein’s failure to schedule a plea hearing, v Prosecutors expressed concern that defense counsel was deliberately filing collateral challenges t
Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s defense to shape a non‑prosecution agreement
The passage provides specific names (U.S. Attorney Geoffrey B. Acosta, lead prosecutor Marie Villafafia, DOJ official Sloman, defense attorney Jay Lefkowitz) and concrete details of private meetings a Emails show prosecutors used private accounts to discuss deal terms with Epstein’s lawyers. Acosta met privately with defense counsel at a Marriott hotel to keep the non‑prosecution agreement Victim
Court hearing references alleged trafficking of witness to foreign presidents and world leaders
The excerpt mentions vague claims that a witness was trafficked to foreign presidents and world leaders, but provides no names, dates, transactions, or concrete evidence. It suggests a possible lead a Witness alleges being trafficked to foreign presidents and world leaders. Defense counsel seeks to exclude those statements from evidence. No specific foreign leaders, dates, or financial details are
Court docket entry for State v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County, Feb 20, 2008
The passage is a routine court filing showing basic case information and attorney appearances. It provides no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑level actors beyond the Case number and date of hearing Names of state and defense counsel Location of the hearing in Palm Beach County
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.